|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910463980603321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Language processing and grammars : the role of functionally oriented computational models / / edited by Brian Nolan, Carlos Periñán-Pascual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Amsterdam, Netherlands : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , 2014 |
|
©2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (402 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Studies in Language Companion Series, , 0165-7763 ; ; Volume 150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Natural language processing (Computer science) |
Functionalism (Linguistics) |
Generative grammar |
Computational linguistics |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Language Processing and Grammars; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Introduction; References; From the extraction of continuous features in parallel texts to visual analytics of heterogeneous areal-typological datasets; 1. Introduction; 2. Algorithmic typology; 2.1 Degree of synthesis; 2.2 Amount of prefixing and suffixing; 2.3 Amount of case marking; 2.4 Synthetic vs. analytic negation marking; 3. Visual analytics; 4. Combining genealogical and areal information in a single visualization; 4.1 The extended sunburst display; 4.2 User interaction; 4.3 Design decisions |
4.4 Meta-information5. Case studies; 5.1 Case study 1: Indo-European languages; 5.2 Case study 2: Languages of Papua New Guinea; 6. Conclusions and outlook; Acknowledgments; References; Lexical-syntactic analysis model of Spanish multi-word expressions; 1. Introduction; 2. Lexicon and syntactic phenomena; 2.1 The Lexicon; 2.2 Lexical and syntactic phenomena; 3. Combinatorial interdependencies; 3.1 Syntagmatic relations; Addition; Ellipsis; Permutation; Versification; 3.2 Paradigmatic relations; Commutation; Deautomatization; Morpho- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
syntactic invariability features |
3.3 Inflectional morphology of complex lexical units3.4 Formal definitions; 3.5 Typology of multi-member lexical units; 4. Formal representation; 5. Conclusions; References; Three-place predicates in RRG; 1. Introduction; 2. RRG accounts to three-place predicates; 3. A new computational model to RRG; 4. Conclusion; References; A Role and Reference Grammar parser for German; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Grammatical features of German; 1.2 The grammar model; 2. German sentence structure in a RRG construction representation; 3. Functional and technical requirements |
4. The constructions used for the parser4.1 Construction 1: Die Katze trinkt die Milch; 4.2 Construction 2: Die Katze trank die Milch; 4.3 Construction 3: Die Katze ist auf dem Tisch; 4.4 Construction 4: Trinkt die Katze die Milch; 4.5 Construction 5: Die Katze hat die Milch getrunken; 4.6 Construction 6: Getrunken hat die Katze die Milch; 4.7 Construction 7: Die Milch wird von der Katze getrunken; 4.8 Construction 8: Die Katze hat die Milch auf dem Tisch getrunken; 5. Functional requirements of the parser; 5.1 Sentence structure; 5.2 The lexicon |
5.3 The layout of the Role and Reference Grammar structure representation6. Testing and results; 6.1 Testing of construction 1; 6.2 Testing of construction 2; 6.3 Testing of construction 3; 6.4 Testing of construction 4; 6.5 Testing of construction 5; 6.6 Testing of construction 6; 6.7 Testing of construction 7; 6.8 Testing of construction 8; 7. Discussion; 7.1 Purpose; 7.2 Significance of this work; 7.3 Future enhancements; References; Extending a lexicalist functional grammar through speech acts, constructions and conversational software agents; 1. Introduction |
2. Intelligent conversational agents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This paper investigates the notion of low-level situational cognitive model, its role in linguistic description and its possible computational treatment in the knowledge base FunGramKB. Low-level situational models are exploited metonymically to produce situation-based implicatures. When such inferences become stably associated with a formal pattern, they give rise to implicational constructions. Other kinds of construction make use of different kinds of cognitive model. For example, argument-structure constructions are based on high-level non-situational cognitive models. The paper then provi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |