|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910463257103321 |
|
|
Autore |
Parkins Ilya |
|
|
Titolo |
Poiret, Dior and Schiaparelli [[electronic resource] ] : fashion, femininity and modernity / / Ilya Parkins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
London ; ; New York, : Berg, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-85785-329-5 |
0-85785-328-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[English ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (207 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Women's clothing - Social aspects |
Clothing and dress - Social aspects |
Fashion - Social aspects |
Feminism - Social aspects |
Fashion designers - France |
Women fashion designers - France |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 179-188) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Poiret, Dior and Schiaparelli; Contents; List of Figures; Acknowledgements; Introduction: Fashion, Femininity and Modernity in Designer Self-fashioning; 1. Fashion and the Time of Modern Femininity; 2. Paul Poiret: Classic and New in the Struggle for Designer Mastery; 3. Elsa Schiaparelli: Glamour, Privacy and Timelessness; 4. Christian Dior: Nostalgia and the Economy of Feminine Beauty; Conclusion: Fashioning Self, Reflecting Ambivalence; Notes; Bibliography; Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Through a highly original and detailed analysis of the memoirs, interviews and other life writings of Poiret, Dior and Schiaparelli, this book explores changing notions of femininity in the early decades of the twentieth century, when the democratization of fashion began. Examining the idea of modernity, eternity and the ephemeral in the writings of these haute couturiers, the book reflects on fashion's ambivalent approach to women, which both celebrated and vilified them, presenting them as both ultra modern style leaders and irrational |
|
|
|
|