Legal mobilization under authoritarianism : the case of post-colonial Hong Kong / / Waikeung Tam [[electronic resource]]

• Record Nr.: UNINA9910462850303321
• Autore: Tam Waikeung
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2013
• ISBN: 1-139-61117-8; 1-107-23792-0; 1-139-61303-0; 1-139-62233-1; 1-283-94308-5; 1-139-62605-1; 1-139-60935-1; 1-139-61675-7; 1-139-42439-4
• Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (xiii, 219 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)
• Collana: Cambridge studies in law and society
• Disciplina: 340/.3095125
• Soggetti: Law reform - China - Hong Kong; Law - Political aspects - China - Hong Kong; Public interest law - China - Hong Kong; Political questions and judicial power - China - Hong Kong; Human rights - China - Hong Kong; Hong Kong (China) Politics and government 1997-
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Note generali: Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
• Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.
• Nota di contenuto: The growth of legal mobilization in post-colonial Hong Kong -- Critical antecedent-legal complex -- The opening of new legal opportunities -- The reversal of political opportunities -- The political origins of cause lawyering in Hong Kong -- Cause lawyers as transformative agents -- Rights advocacy groups as transformative agents -- The impacts of the judicialization of politics.
• Sommario/riassunto: Legal mobilization is the process by which individuals invoke their legal rights and use litigation to defend or develop these rights against the government. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to this ; phenomenon as it occurs under authoritarian regimes. It is often suggested that, in such situations, legal mobilization is caused by the strategic interests of the ruling elites. Using the case study of post-colonial Hong Kong, where legal mobilization has by no means unfolded as political authorities would wish, Waikeung Tam casts doubt on this contention. To do so, he examines in depth why and how legal mobilization arises under authoritarianism. Tam analyses quantitative data of changes in the Hong Kong judiciary agendas over the last three decades and uses detailed interviews with activists, politicians, cause lawyers, judges and government officials to reveal the complex underlying socio-political forces at play.