|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910462777303321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Studies in Plato's metaphysics / / edited by R.E. Allen |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Abingdon, Oxon : , : Routledge, , 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-7100-3626-4 |
0-203-10167-7 |
1-283-84724-8 |
1-136-23645-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (473 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Routledge library editions. Plato |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Metaphysics |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
First published in 1965 by Routledge and Kegan Paul. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
STUDIES IN PLATO'S METAPHYSICS; Copyright; Studies in Plato's Metaphysics; Copyright; Contents; Preface; Introduction; I. The Philosophical Economy of the Theory of Ideas (1936); II. Logos and Forms in Plato (1954); III. Logos and Forms in Plato: A Reply to Professor Cross (1956); IV. Participation and Predication in Plato's Middle Dialogues (1960); V. Mathematics and Dialectic in the Republic VI-VII (1932); VI. Plato's Parmendies (1939); VII. Plato's Parmendies (1959); VIII. Knowledge and Forms in Plato's Theaetetus (1957); IX. Symploke Eidon (1955) |
X. Plato and the Copula : Sophist 251-9(1957)XI. Plato's Description of Division (1954); XII. The Third Man Argument in the Parmendies (1954); XIII. The Third Man Again (1956); XIV. Postscript to the Third Man : A Reply to Mr. Geach (1956); XV. A Proof in the Peri Ideon (1957); XVI. The Place of the Timaeus in Plato's Dialogues (1953); XVII. The Relation of the Timaeus to Plato's Later Dialogues (1957); XVIII. The Disorderly Motion in the Timaeus (1939); XIX. Necessity and Persuation in Plato's Timaeus (1950; XX. Plato's Thesim (1936); Index Locorum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Did Plato abandon, or sharply modify, the Theory of Forms in later life? In the Phaedo, Symposium, and Republic it is generally agreed that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plato held that universals exist. But in Parmenides, he subjected that theory to criticism. If the criticism were valid, and Plato knew so, then the Parmenides marks a turning point in his thought. If, however, Plato became aware that there are radical differences in the logical behaviour of concepts, and the later dialogues are a record of his attempt to analyse those differences, then Plato's thought can be said to have move |
|
|
|
|
|
| |