|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910461983003321 |
|
|
Autore |
Eich Frank |
|
|
Titolo |
Reforming the public pension system in the Russian Federation [[electronic resource] /] / prepared by Frank Eich, Charleen Gust, and Mauricio Soto |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Washington, DC, : International Monetary Fund, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-4755-2677-6 |
1-4755-5498-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (26 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
IMF working paper ; ; 12/201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
GustCharleen |
SotoMauricio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Pension trusts - Russia (Federation) |
Pensions - Government policy - Russia (Federation) |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Cover; Contents; I. Introduction; II. Russia's Current Pension System; Tables; 1. Key Parameters of the Russian Pension System; 2. Pension Spending and Characteristics of the Russian Pension System, 2000-10; Figures; 1. Contribution Rates and Replacement Rates, 2010; III. Challenges from Aging Populations; A. Common Challenges; 2. Demographic Trends, 2012-30; B. The Impact of Aging on Pension Spending; 3. Public Pension Spending, 2012; 4. Projected Public Pension Spending in Russia, 2010-50; Boxes; 1. What Have Other Countries Done?; IV. Choices and Proposals |
A. Reducing the Replacement RatesB. Reducing Pension Eligibility; C. Increasing Revenues; 5. Impact of Increasing Retirement Ages, 2010-50; V. Concluding Comments; Appendix; Methodology and Data; References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Pension reform is a key policy challenge in Russia. This paper examines how pension spending could increase in Russia in the absence of reforms, quantifies the impact of some recent proposals, and suggests some alternatives that would ensure public pension benefits - relative to wages - not fall from current levels while containing spending. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|