| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910461773903321 |
|
|
Autore |
Postal Paul Martin <1936-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Edge-based clausal syntax [[electronic resource] ] : a study of (mostly) English object structure / / Paul M. Postal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cambridge, Mass., : MIT Press, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-262-29505-9 |
1-280-49902-8 |
9786613594259 |
0-262-29548-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (484 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Grammar, Comparative and general - Syntax |
Grammar, Comparative and general - Clauses |
English language - Syntax |
English language - Clauses |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. [431]-451) and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
In this volume, Paul Postal rejects the notion that an English phrase of the form [V + DP] invariably involves a grammatical relation properly chracterized as a 'direct object'. He argues instead that at least three distinct relations occur in such a structure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNISA996215287703316 |
|
|
Titolo |
Duke journal of gender law & policy |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
[Durham, N.C.], : [Duke University School of Law] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISSN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Sex and law |
Sex discrimination - Law and legislation |
Men - Legal status, laws, etc |
Women - Legal status, laws, etc |
Law reviews. |
Periodicals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Periodico |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
"The Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy is an interdisciplinary publication devoted to a discussion of gender, sexuality, race, and class in the context of law and public policy. Our mission is to foster debate, to publish work largely overlooked by other law reviews, and to encourage scholarship outside the bounds of conventional law school curricula. In doing so, we take an expansive view of law, engaging other disciplines including literature, sociology, anthropology, psychology, politics, and critical theory. Our goal is not only to explore what the law was and is, but what it could and should be."--About us page. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |