|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910461447603321 |
|
|
Titolo |
How should one live? [[electronic resource] ] : comparing ethics in ancient China and Greco-Roman antiquity / / edited by R.A.H. King and Dennis Schilling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Berlin ; ; Boston, : de Gruyter, c2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-283-40020-0 |
9786613400208 |
3-11-025289-9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (352 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
KingR. A. H |
SchillingDennis R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Ethics, Comparative |
Ethics, Ancient |
Ethics - China |
Ethics - Greece |
Ethics - Rome |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
"The papers published here were among those discussed in the Münchner Kompetenzzentrum Ethik, Philosophy Department, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich and the Carl Friedrich von Siemens Stiftung Munich on October 1st-3rd, 2007"--Acknowledgements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
pt. 1. Methods -- pt. 2. Ethical history -- pt. 3. China -- pt. 4. Greece and Rome -- pt. 5. Comparisons. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Chinese and Greco-Roman ethics present highly articulate views on how one should live; both of these traditions remain influential in modern philosophy. The question arises how these traditions can be compared with one another. Comparative ethics is a relatively young discipline, and this volume is a major contribution to the field. Fundamental questions about the nature of comparing ethics are treated in two introductory chapters, followed by chapters on core issues in each of the traditions : harmony, virtue, friendship, knowledge, the relation of ethics to morality, relativism. The volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
closes with a number of comparative studies on emotions, being and unity, simplicity and complexity, and prediction. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |