|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910461413403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Dodd Brian J. <1960-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Paulʹs paradigmatic "I" [[electronic resource] ] : personal example as literary strategy / / Brian Dodd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Sheffield, England, : Sheffield Academic Press, c1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-283-27121-4 |
9786613271211 |
0-567-63199-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (291 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Journal for the study of the New Testament. Supplement series ; ; 177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Bible as literature |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
CONTENTS; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Chapter 1; INTRODUCTION; Chapter 2; 1 CORINTHIANS 1-4: 'THAT YOU MAY LEARN FROM OUR EXAMPLE'; Chapter 3; PAUL, SPIRITUAL PARENT AND PARADIGM IN CHRIST:1 CORINTHIANS 4.14-15.58; Chapter 4; GALATIANS: PERSONAL EXAMPLE, CONTRASTIVE MODELS; Chapter 5; PHILIPPIANS: POLEMICAL AND PARADIGMATIC SELF-PORTRAYAL; Chapter 6; IMPLICIT USES OF PERSONAL EXAMPLE: PHILEMON AND 1 THESSALONIANS 2.1-12; Chapter 7; A CASE IN POINT: ROMANS 7.7-25; Chapter 8; CONCLUSION; BIBLIOGRAPHY; Index of References; Index of Authors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This study claims that Paul uses his personal example as an explicit literary strategy in 1 Corinthians, Galatians and Philippians, and as an arguably implicit strategy in 1 Thessalonians and Philemon. He uses his own example to ground and illustrate his argumentation in a rhetorically sophisticated manner, often structuring his argument on such a basis. In places a crisp statement of his own case serves as a thesis statement of the argument that follows (e.g., Rom. 1.17; Gal. 1.10), while at other times it serves to summarize the argument and to provide a transition to the next phase (especia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|