|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910461397803321 |
|
|
Autore |
Crowley Sharon <1943-> |
|
|
Titolo |
The methodical memory [[electronic resource] ] : invention in current-traditional rhetoric / / Sharon Crowley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Carbondale, : Southern Illinois University Press, c1990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-280-69813-6 |
9786613675095 |
0-8093-8593-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (230 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Invention (Rhetoric) |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Cover; Book Title; Copyright Page; Contents; Preface; Acknowledgments; 1. Public Knowledge and Private Inspiration: On Invention, Classical and Modern; 2. How the Outside Gets Inside: The Psychology of the Methodical Memory; 3. How Insides Get Outside Again: The Logic of the Methodical Memory; 4. Subjects and Objects: Logical and Psychological Models of Invention in Early Current-Traditional Rhetoric; 5. Select, Narrow, and Amplify: Invention in Mature Current-Traditional Rhetoric; 6. EDNA Takes Over: The Modes of Discourse; 7. The Methodical Memory on Display: The Five-Paragraph Theme |
8. So What's Wrong with Current-Traditional Rhetoric, Anyway?9. The Limits of Modern Epistemology for Writing Instruction or Why Current-Traditional Rhetoric Is Not a Rhetoric; Notes; References Cited; Index; Author Bio; Back Cover |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
In this first sustained critique of current-traditional rhetorical theory, Sharon Crowley uses a postmodern, deconstructive reading to reexamine the historical development of current-traditional rhetoric. She identifies it (as well as the British new rhetoric from which it developed) as a philosophy of language use that posits universal principles of mind and discourse. Crowley argues that these |
|
|
|
|