|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910461369403321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Cultural expertise and litigation : patterns, conflicts, narratives / / edited by Livia Holden |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; ; New York, N.Y. : , : Routledge, , 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-283-15123-5 |
1-136-73522-4 |
9786613151230 |
0-203-81830-X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (254 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Forensic anthropology |
Forensic sociology |
Evidence, Expert |
Asylum, Right of |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (pages [212]-225) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
South Asian Muslims and country expertise in the American immigration courts / Sylvia Vatuk -- When South Asians marry trans-jurisdictionally : some reflections on immigration cases by an expert? / Prakash Shah -- French law courts and South Asians litigants / Vronique Bouillier -- Being on and being in : exposure and influence of academic experts in contemporary Denmark / Stig Toft Madsen -- Witness statements and credibility assessments in the British asylum courts / Anthony Good -- Honour killing?, or, Just plain homicide? / Roger Ballard -- Life and law : advocacy and expert witnessing in the UK / Werner Menski -- The case of S. : elaborating the right? narrative to fit normative/political expectation in asylum procedure in Italy / Tommaso Sbriccoli and Stefano Jacoviello -- Expert report writing : professional commitments and legal outcomes / Livia Holden. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Cultural Expertise and Litigation addresses the role of social scientists as a source of expert evidence, and is a product of their experiences and observations of cases involving litigants of South Asian origin. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is meant in court by ""culture,"" ""custom"" and ""law""? How are these concepts understood by witnesses, advocates, judges and litigants? How far are cross-cultural understandings facilitated - or obscured - in the process? What strategies are adopted? And which ones turn out to be successful in court? How is cultural understanding - and misunderstanding - pro |
|
|
|
|
|
| |