|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910461042303321 |
|
|
Autore |
Conant James K. |
|
|
Titolo |
The life cycles of the Council on Environmental Quality and the Environmental Protection Agency : 1970-2035 / / James K. Conant and Peter J. Balint |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York, New York : , : Oxford University Press, , 2016 |
|
©2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-19-755949-2 |
0-19-020372-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (213 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Oxford scholarship online |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Environmental policy - United States |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Previously issued in print: 2016. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Cover; Contents; Preface and Acknowledgments; 1. Environmental Politics, Policy, and Administration in the United States; 2. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Rise of Environmental Protection in the 1970s, and the Political Drama of the Next Three Decades; 3. Life Cycle Models of Organizations; 4. The Council on Environmental Quality: 1970-2010; 5. The Environmental Protection Agency: 1970-2010; 6. Comparing the Paths of the Council on Environmental Quality and the Environmental Protection Agency and Assessing the Life Cycle Models |
7. The Future of the Council on Environmental Quality and the Environmental Protection Agency: 2015-2035Postscript: Sustainability and the Environmental Protection Agency; Appendix 1; Appendix 2; Notes; Bibliography; Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
In this book, James K. Conant and Peter J. Balint examine the trajectory of environmental policy and administration in the United States by looking at the development of the CEQ and EPA. They look at changes in budgetary and staffing resources over time as well as the role of quality of leadership as key indicators of capacity and vitality. As well, they make correlations between the agencies' fortunes and various |
|
|
|
|