1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910460989503321

Autore

Bourinot John George <1837-1902, >

Titolo

Our intellectual strength and weakness : 'English-Canadian Literrature', 'French-Canadian Literature'. / / John George Bourinot, Thomas Guthrie Marquis, Camille Roy ; introduction by Clara Thomas

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Toronto, [Ontario] ; ; Buffalo, [New York] : , : University of Toronto Press, , 1973

©1973

ISBN

1-4426-3230-5

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (299 p.)

Collana

Literature of Canada Poetry and Prose in Reprint

Disciplina

917.1

Soggetti

Canadian literature - History and criticism

Electronic books.

Canada Intellectual life

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Includes index.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- Introduction -- Our Intellectual Strength and Weakness -- 'English-Canadian Literature' -- 'French-Canadian Literature'

Sommario/riassunto

These three works, displaying marked differences in purpose, tone, and effect, are all classics of Canadian literary and cultural criticism.John George Bourinot was a man of letters, an Imperialist, and a biculturalist, who was confident of his knowledge of the Canadian identity and felt it to be his public mission to align reality with his own personal vision. Writing in 1893 to the élite represented by the members of the Royal Society, he described his work as ‘a monograph on the intellectual development of the Dominion,’ describing ‘the progress of culture in a country still struggling with the difficulties of the material development of half a continent.’Two decades later, Thomas Guthrie Marquis and Camille Roy wrote what were, in contrast, specialized assignments, contributions to the compendium history, Canada and Its Provinces (1913). Addressing a far larger audience, and treating a vastly enlarged body of Canadian literature, their work comes much closer to contemporary scholarship, with greater clarity, organization, and sheer bulk of information, but with the loss of some of the charm and



assurance of Bourinot’s wide sweep. In further contrast to Bourinot’s determined biculturalism and will to unity, Roy and Marquis’ essays display vivid differences in the emotional allegiances and convictions of the founding cultures. Marquis starts by asking the question, ‘Has Canada a voice of her own in literature distinct from that of England?’; Roy treats French-Canadian literature in its Roman Catholic contexts.