| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNISA990006135970203316 |
|
|
Autore |
ARNOLDUS : , Leodiensis |
|
|
Titolo |
Arnoldi Leodiensis Alphabetum narrationum / e schedis Coletae Ribaucourt ; edidit Elisa Brilli ; auxilium praestantibus Jacques Berlioz et Marie Anne Polo De Beaulieu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titolo uniforme |
Alphabetum narrationum |
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
CVIII, 752 p., 1 facsimile ; 25 cm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Corpus Christianorum , Continuatio Mediaevalis ; 160 |
Exempla Medii aevi ; 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collocazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910460265403321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Ain'thology : the history and life of a taboo word / / edited by Patricia Donaher and Seth Katz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Newcastle upon Tyne, England : , : Cambridge Scholars Publishing, , 2015 |
|
©2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (376 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Taboo, Linguistic |
English language - Semantics |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; INTRODUCTION; I; CHAPTER ONE; CHAPTER TWO; CHAPTER THREE; II; CHAPTER FOUR; CHAPTER FIVE; CHAPTER SIX; CHAPTER SEVEN; III; CHAPTER EIGHT; CHAPTER NINE; CHAPTER TEN; IV; CHAPTER ELEVEN; CHAPTER TWELVE; CHAPTER THIRTEEN; CONTRIBUTORS; INDEX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The word ain't is used by speakers of all dialects and sociolects of English. Nonetheless, language critics view ain't as marking speakers as ""lazy"" or ""stupid""; and the educated assume ain't is on its deathbed, used only in clichés. Everyone has an opinion about ain't. Even the grammar-checker in Microsoft Word flags every ain't with a red underscore. But why? Over the past 100 years, only a few articles and sections of books have reviewed the history of ain't or discussed it in dialect cont... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |