|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910460170103321 |
|
|
Autore |
Acharya Amitav |
|
|
Titolo |
Whose ideas matter? [[electronic resource] ] : agency and power in Asian regionalism / / Amitav Acharya |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Ithaca, : Cornell University Press, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Cornell studies in political economy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classificazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Regionalism - Asia |
International agencies - Asia |
Asian cooperation |
Electronic books. |
Asia Foreign relations |
Asia Politics and government 1945- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 179-182) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter -- Contents -- List of Illustrations and Tables -- Acknowledgments -- 1. Why Study the Norm Dynamics of Asian Regionalism? -- 2. Perspectives on Norm Diffusion -- 3. Ideas and Power: Non- Intervention and Collective Defense -- 4. Constructing Asia's Cognitive Prior -- 5. Resistance and Change: Common Security and Collective Intervention -- 6. Conclusions, Extensions, and Extrapolations -- Appendix: Key Concepts, Regional Definition -- Bibliography of Primary Sources -- Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Asia is a crucial battleground for power and influence in the international system. It is also a theater of new experiments in regional cooperation that could redefine global order. Whose Ideas Matter? is the first book to explore the diffusion of ideas and norms in the international system from the perspective of local actors, with Asian regional institutions as its main focus.There's no Asian equivalent of the EU or of NATO. Why has Asia, and in particular Southeast Asia, avoided such multilateral institutions? Most accounts focus on U.S. interests and perceptions or intraregional rivalries to explain the design and effectiveness of regional institutions in Asia such as SEATO, ASEAN, |
|
|
|
|