| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910459977403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Gray James |
|
|
Titolo |
Why Our Drug Laws Have Failed [[electronic resource] ] : A Judicial Indictment of the War on Drugs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Philadelphia PA, : Temple University Press, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (286 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
362.29/16/0973 |
362.29160973 |
362.2960973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Drug abuse -- Government policy -- United States |
Drug control -- United States |
Drug control |
Social Welfare & Social Work |
Substance Abuse |
Social Sciences |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Contents; PART I: Introduction; PART II: Our Drug Laws Have Failed; 1 Past and Present; 2 Increased Harm to Communities; 3 Erosion of Protections of the Bill of Rights; 4 Increased Harm to Drug Users; 5 Increased Harm for the Future; PART III: Options; 6 Increased Zero Tolerance; 7 Education; 8 Drug Treatment; 9 De-profitization of Drugs; 10 Federalism, Not Federalization; PART IV: What We Can Do About It; Appendix A: Resolution; Appendix B: Government Commission Reports and Other Public Inquiries; Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Our drug prohibition policy is hopeless, just as Prohibition, our alcohol prohibition policy, was before it. Today there are more drugs in our communities and at lower prices and higher strengths than ever before.We have built large numbers of prisons, but they are overflowing with non-violent drug offenders. The huge profits made from drug sales are corrupting people and institutions here and abroad. And far from being |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
protected by our drug prohibition policy, our children are being recruited by it to a lifestyle of drug use and drug selling.Judge Gray's book drives a sta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910416144303321 |
|
|
Autore |
Yang Kai |
|
|
Titolo |
The Art of Trial Process : An Outline of Judicial Philosophy in China / / by Kai Yang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Singapore : , : Springer Singapore : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed. 2020.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (110 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Conflict of laws |
Law - Philosophy |
Law |
Social sciences |
Political science |
Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law |
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History |
Methodology of the Social Sciences |
Philosophy of Law |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
A General View on the Chinese Judges Judicial Art -- The Theoretical Foundation of the Art of Adjudication -- Quality Constitutions of the Chinese Adjudication Art -- The Evaluation Standard of the Art of Adjudication -- Principles of the Art of Adjudication -- Nourishment of the Art of Adjudication. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book focuses on the reality of China’s modern judiciary, systematically demonstrating and discussing the judicial philosophy and judicial ethics as applied by Chinese courts and judges. In order to illustrate the methods of jurisprudence and sociology of law in the context of China’s judicial practice and practicability of applicable laws, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it also addresses judicial methodology and Chinese judges' trial methods. Based on comparative study and aiming at global judicial reform, the book provides valuable guidance and insights for readers pursuing a detailed understanding of modern Chinese judiciary, Chinese judges and Chinese rule of law. The book is intended to primarily serve the need of legal professionals around the world, in particular those who are interested in China’s judicial system. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |