1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910458960103321

Autore

Kalar Brent

Titolo

The demands of taste in Kant's aesthetics / / Brent Kalar

Pubbl/distr/stampa

London ; ; New York : , : Continuum, , 2006

ISBN

1-4725-4588-5

1-281-29526-4

9786611295264

1-84714-450-0

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (189 p.)

Collana

Continuum studies in philosophy

Disciplina

111/.85092

Soggetti

Aesthetics, Modern - 18th century

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references (pages [167]-171) and index.

Nota di contenuto

Introduction -- I. What is Implied in a Judgment of Taste? -- II. The Problem of Free Play -- III. The Problem of the Form of Purposiveness -- IV. Beauty and Aesthetic Ideas -- V. Pleasure and Justification -- Bibliography

Sommario/riassunto

Typically philosophers have either viewed beauty as objective and judgments of beauty as universally valid, or else they have viewed beauty as subjective and regarded judgments of beauty as merely private preferences. Immanuel Kant is famous for his unique third path. Kant argues that beauty is subjective, but the judgment of taste about beauty is capable of universal validity. In his view, the beautiful is not a feature of objects themselves, but merely represents the way we respond to objects. Furthermore, the judgment of taste about beauty is a merely 'aesthetic' judgment - i.e., one based on a feeling of pleasure we take in the object. The judgment of taste, on the other hand, possesses 'universal validity': to call something beautiful is implicitly to 'demand' that all others find it beautiful as well. Kant's views about the taste for the beautiful have long been the subject of controversy. Scholars have differed over the interpretation of the demand contained in a judgment of taste and whether Kant's attempt to legitimate this demand is successful. Brent Kalar argues that the demands of taste should be understood as involving a uniquely aesthetic normativity



rooted in Kant's cognitive psychology. If the basis of aesthetic pleasure in the activity of the cognitive faculties is properly understood, then Kant's attempt to legitimate the demands of taste may be regarded as a success. This leads Kalar to give a new interpretation of the nature of the beautiful according to Kant that re-examines the relationship between 'free play' and the 'form of purposiveness' in Kant's aesthetics, and restores the 'aesthetic ideas' to their rightful centrality in Kant's theory