| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910458232303321 |
|
|
Autore |
Peritz Rudolph J. R |
|
|
Titolo |
Competition policy in America [[electronic resource] ] : history, rhetoric, law / / Rudolph J.R. Peritz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York, : Oxford University Press, 2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-281-34685-3 |
9786611346850 |
0-19-803292-7 |
1-60256-852-9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[Rev. ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (425 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Antitrust law - United States - History |
Competition - United States - History |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 331-395) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Contents; Introduction; 1. Public Debate About Competition Policy, 1888-1911: Free Competition and Freedom of Contract; 2. The Era of Cooperative Competition, 1911-1933: Trade and Labor Associations, Political Majorities, and Speech Rights; 3. The New Deal's Political Economy, 1933-1948: From Organic Body Politic to Unified Body Economic; 4. Competition, Pluralism, and the Problem of Persistent Oligarchy, 1948-1967; 5. Rhetorics of Free Competition, 1968-1980: Efficiency, Property Rights, and Equality |
6. Rhetorics of Free Competition, 1980-1992: Free Market Imagery, Corporate Control, and the Problem of Equality Concluding Thoughts: On the Limits of Competition Policy; Afterword. The New Economy at Century's End: Market Access, Innovation, and Being Bill Gates; Notes; Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
In this volume, Peritz analyses how free competition has signified both freedom from oppressive government and freedom from private economic power. Peritz shows how these two complex yet distinct and sometimes contradictory images have influenced government policy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and continue to inspire public debate over political economy in America. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |