|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910457726903321 |
|
|
Autore |
Gert Joshua |
|
|
Titolo |
Brute rationality : normativity and human action / / Joshua Gert [[electronic resource]] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-107-14913-4 |
1-280-51612-7 |
0-511-21479-0 |
0-511-21658-0 |
0-511-21121-X |
0-511-31536-8 |
0-511-48708-8 |
0-511-21298-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (xiii, 230 pages) : digital, PDF file(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Cambridge studies in philosophy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Normativity (Ethics) |
Decision making - Moral and ethical aspects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 221-225) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
What would an adequate theory of rationality be like? -- Practical rationality, morality, and purely justificatory reasons -- The criticism from internalism about practical reasons -- A functional role analysis of reasons -- Accounting for our actual normative judgments -- Fitting the view into the contemporary debate -- Two concepts of rationality -- Internalism and different kinds of reasons -- Brute rationality. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book presents an account of normative practical reasons and the way in which they contribute to the rationality of action. Rather than simply 'counting in favour of' actions, normative reasons play two logically distinct roles: requiring action and justifying action. The distinction between these two roles explains why some reasons do not seem relevant to the rational status of an action unless the agent cares about them, while other reasons retain all their force regardless of the agent's attitude. It also explains why the class of rationally permissible |
|
|
|
|