|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910457569403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Kelly L. G (Louis G.) |
|
|
Titolo |
Pseudo-Albertus Magnus, Quaestiones Alberti de modis significandi [[electronic resource] ] : a critical edition, translation and commentary of the British Museum incunabulum C.21.C.52 and the Cambridge incunabulum Inc.5.J.3.7. / / by L.G. Kelly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Amsterdam, : J. Benjamins, 1977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-283-31448-7 |
9786613314482 |
90-272-8141-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (229 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series III, Studies in the history of linguistics ; ; v. 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
Pseudo-Albertus Magnus |
Albertus, Magnus, Saint, <1193?-1280.> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Speculative grammar |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Text in Latin and English. |
Quaestiones Alberti de modis significandi has been erroneously attributed to Albertus Magnus. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
PSEUDO-ALBERTUS MAGNUS QUAESTIONES ALBERTI DE MODIS SIGNIFICANDI; Editorial page; Title page; Dedication; Copyright page; Table of contents; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS; BIBLIOGRAPHY; INTRODUCTION; QUAESTIONES ALBERTI DE MODIS SIGNIFICANDI; END NOTES; Indexes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book provides a critical edition, translation and commentary of the British Museum Incunabulum C.21.C.52 and the Cambridge Incunabulum 5.J.3.7. of the Quaestiones Alberti. Although the British Museum catalogue ascribes the incunabulum to Albertus Magnus, the authorship is debated.The format of the twenty-one questions of this text follows the standard pattern of the time: after stating the question, the author cites as argumenta opinions with which he does not agree, gives his own answer, and then refutes the argumenta.For the author of these questions, three is |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|