|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910456965903321 |
|
|
Autore |
Knight Jack <1952-> |
|
|
Titolo |
The priority of democracy [[electronic resource] ] : political consequences of pragmatism / / Jack Knight and James Johnson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Princeton [N.J.], : Princeton University Press, c2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-283-15256-8 |
9786613152565 |
1-4008-4033-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[Course Book] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (343 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
A Princeton University Press e-book |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Democracy - Philosophy |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Preliminaries -- Pragmatism and the problem of institutional design -- The appeal of decentralization -- The priority of democracy and the burden of justification -- Reconsidering the role of political argument in democratic politics -- Refining reflexivity -- Formal conditions : institutionalizing liberal guarantees -- Substantive conditions : pragmatism and effectiveness. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Pragmatism and its consequences are central issues in American politics today, yet scholars rarely examine in detail the relationship between pragmatism and politics. In The Priority of Democracy, Jack Knight and James Johnson systematically explore the subject and make a strong case for adopting a pragmatist approach to democratic politics--and for giving priority to democracy in the process of selecting and reforming political institutions. What is the primary value of democracy? When should we make decisions democratically and when should we rely on markets? And when should we accept the decisions of unelected officials, such as judges or bureaucrats? Knight and Johnson explore how a commitment to pragmatism should affect our answers to such important questions. They conclude that democracy is a good way of determining how these kinds of decisions should be made--even if what the democratic process determines is |
|
|
|
|