|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910456753803321 |
|
|
Autore |
Koskela Douglas M. <1972-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Ecclesiality and ecumenism [[electronic resource] ] : Yves Congar and the road to unity / / Douglas M. Koskela |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Milwaukee, Wis., : Marquette University Press, c2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (174 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Marquette studies in theology ; ; No. 61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Church - History of doctrines - 20th century |
Christian union - Catholic Church - History - 20th century |
Ecumenical movement - History - 20th century |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
short title ECCLESIALITY AND ECUMENISM: YVES CONGAR AND THE ROAD TO UNITY; title page ECCLESIALITY AND ECUMENISM: YVES CONGAR AND THE ROAD TO UNITY; copyright page; table of contents; dedication To my parents, Roger and Kay Lyne Koskela, who introduced me to the church, and who model its fellowship daily.; Acknowledgements; Introduction; PART I; Chapter 1 THE SHIFTING STATUS OF PROTESTANT COMMUNIONS IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY; Chapter 2 PROTESTANT ECCLESIALITY IN THE VIEW OF REPRESENTATIVE CATHOLIC THEOLOGIANS; PART II; Chapter 3 THE DIVINE-HUMAN TENSION AS CENTRAL TO CONGAR'S ECCLESIOLOG Y |
Chapter 4 CENTRAL DIMENSIONS OF ECCLESIALITY IN CONGAR'S DOCTRINE OF THE CHURCHPART III; Chapter 5 THE ENGAGEMENT OF PNEUMATOLOGY IN CONGAR'S DOCTRINE OF THE CHURCH; Chapter 6 ECUMENICAL PROMISE AND REMAINING CHALENGES; BIBLIOGRAPHY; index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The ecumenical movement currently faces a number of notable challenges. While relations between Christian communities improved significantly over the course of the 20th century, partners in ecumenical dialogues often brought to the table fundamentally different conceptions of the nature of the church. Thus, the problem of |
|
|
|
|