1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910456504903321

Autore

Hufton Olwen H.

Titolo

Women and the limits of citizenship in the French Revolution / / Olwen H. Hufton

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Toronto, [Ontario] ; ; Buffalo, [New York] ; ; London, [England] : , : University of Toronto Press, , 1999

©1992

ISBN

9786612056482

1-4426-8355-4

1-282-05648-4

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (228 p.)

Collana

Donald G. Creighton lectures  Women and the limits of citizenship in the French Revolution

Disciplina

944.04/082

Soggetti

Women's rights - France - History - 18th century

Electronic books.

France History Revolution, 1789-1799 Women

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Foreword -- Preface -- Chapter One. Women and Politics -- Chapter Two. Poverty and Charity: Revolutionary Mythology and Real Women -- Chapter Three. In Search of Counter-Revolutionary Women -- Chapter Four. Epilogue. The Legacy: Myth and Memory -- Notes -- Select Bibliography -- Index

Sommario/riassunto

The French masses overwhelmingly supported the Revolution in 1789. Economic hardship, hunger, and debt combined to put them solidly behind the leaders. But between the people's expectations and the politicians' interpretation of what was needed to construct a new state lay a vast chasm. Olwen H. Hufton explores the responses of two groups of working women - those in rural areas and those in Paris - to the revolution's aftermath.Women were denied citizenship in the new state, but they were not apolitical. In Paris, collective female activity promoted a controlled economy as women struggled to secure an adequate supply of bread at a reasonable price. Rural women engaged in collective confrontation to undermine government religious policy



which was destroying the networks of traditional Catholic charity.Hufton examines the motivations of these two groups, the strategies they used to advance their respective causes, and the bitter misogyinistic legacy of the republican tradition which persisted into the twentieth century.