|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910456361603321 |
|
|
Autore |
Sparshott Francis Edward <1926-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Taking life seriously : a study of the argument of the Nicomachean ethics / / Francis Sparshott |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Toronto, [Ontario] ; ; Buffalo, [New York] ; ; London, [England] : , : University of Toronto Press, , 1996 |
|
©1994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-282-04538-5 |
9786612045387 |
1-4426-8032-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (353 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Toronto Studies in Philosophy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
PHILOSOPHY / Ethics & Moral Philosophy |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Foreword -- Introduction -- 1. What Is Best for People (I i-xii; 1094a1-1102a4) -- 2. Reason in Action (I xiii-VI; 1102a5–1145a11) -- 3. The Pathology of Practical Reason (VII; 1145a15–1154b34) -- 4. Love, Consciousness, and Society (VIII-IX; 1155a1–1172a15) -- 5. The Worth of Pleasure (X i-v; 1172a19–1176a29) -- 6. The Good Life and the Best Life: Outline of a Discourse (X vi-viii; 1176a30–1179a32) -- 7. Postscript: The Transition to Politics (X ix; 1179a33–1181b23) -- Afterword -- Appendix: Aristotle's World -- Notes -- Glossary -- References -- Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This is the first book in modern times that makes sense of the Nicomachean Ethics in its entirety as an interesting philosophical argument, rather than as a compilation of relatively independent essays. In Taking Life Seriously Francis Sparshott expounds Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics as a single continuous argument, a chain of reasoned exposition on the problems of human life. He guides the reader through the whole text passage by passage, showing how every part of it makes sense in the light of what has gone before, as well as indicating problems in Aristotle's argument.No knowledge of Greek is |
|
|
|
|