Setting priorities for clinical practice guidelines [[electronic resource] /] / Committee on Methods for Setting Priorities for Guidelines Development, Division of Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine ; Marilyn J. Field, editor

• Record Nr.: UNINA9910455972703321
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: Washington, D.C., : National Academy Press, 1995
• ISBN: 1-280-19298-4; 9786610192984; 0-309-58797-2; 0-585-02235-6
• Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (176 p.)
• Altri autori (Persone): FieldMarilyn J (Marilyn Jane)
• Disciplina: 362.1/0973
• Soggetti: Medical care - Standards - United States; Electronic books.
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Note generali: Description based upon print version of record.
• Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references.
• Nota di contenuto: ""Setting Priorities for Clinical Practice Guidelines""; ""Copyright""; ""Acknowledgments""; ""Contents""; ""Summary""; ""STUDY APPROACH""; ""FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: PRIORITY SETTING""; ""Criteria and Their Application""; ""Procedure Modifications""; ""Topic Definition""; ""FUTURE ROLES FOR AHCPR""; ""National and Local Guidelines""; ""Clearinghouse, Assessment, and Other Activities""; ""1 Introduction""; ""BACKGROUND""; ""COMMITTEE APPROACH""; ""Composition and Activities""; ""Definitions""; ""Principles""; ""PRIORITY SETTING IN OTHER ORGANIZATIONS""; ""American College of Physicians""; ""Intermountain Health Care""""Kaiser Permanente, Northern California Region""; ""State of Minnesota""; ""Office of Medical Applications and Research, National Institutes of Health""; ""U.S. Preventive Services Task Force""; ""OVERVIEW OF REPORT""; ""2 Criteria for Topic Selection""; ""CURRENT CRITERIA FOR GUIDELINES TOPICS""; ""CURRENT CRITERIA FOR TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT""; ""DIFFERENCES IN CRITERIA FOR GUIDELINES AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT""; ""TOWARD COMMON ; CRITERIA?""; ""General Criteria""; ""Potential for Guidelines to Change Health Outcomes or Costs""; ""Social, Ethical, and Legal Considerations""""Availability of Evidence""; ""ADDITIONAL CRITERIA""; ""Criterion Measurement""; ""THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF INDIVIDUAL CRITERIA""; ""Criteria Weights""; ""Measurement Scales""; ""Availability of Data""; ""PROCEDURES FOR APPLYING CRITERIA""; ""Simultaneous Application of Criteria""; ""Sequential Application of Criteria""; ""Single-Versus Multiple-Track Processes""; ""REASSESSMENT OF EXISTING GUIDELINES""; ""3 Procedures for Priority Setting""; ""FORUM AND OHTA PRIORITY-SETTING PROCEDURES""; ""The Forum's Procedures for Topic Selection""; ""OHTA'S Procedures for Priority Setting""""Comparing Procedures""; ""Other Organizations""; ""TOWARD COMMON PROCEDURES?""; ""PROCESS MODIFICATIONS: IMPROVING THE USE OF EXPERT JUDGMENT""; ""Systematizing Consensus Development""; ""More Systematic Use of Questionnaires""; ""DEVELOPMENT OF A PROCEDURE MANUAL""; ""4 Future Directions for Priority Setting""; ""REVIEW OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON PRIORITY SETTING""; ""The Current AHCPR Process and the OHTA Option""; ""Criteria and Their Application""; ""Modifications in Procedures""; ""DEFINITION OF GUIDELINES TOPICS""; ""NATIONAL AND LOCAL GUIDELINES""""FUTURE ROLES FOR AHCPR""; ""A Two-Stage Approach to Guidelines Development""; ""The Forum as Clearinghouse""; ""Assessing Guidelines Developed by Other Organizations""; ""Proficiency or Performance Guidelines""; ""Coordination with Other Government Agencies""; ""CONCLUSION""; ""References""; ""A Setting Priorities for Health Technology Assessment: A Model Process Executive Summary""; ""RATIONALE""; ""METHODS OF PRIORITY SETTING""; ""GUIDING PRINCIPLES""; ""THE PROCESS PROPOSED BY THE IOM COMMITTEE""; ""Steps in the Process""; ""Seven Criteria""; ""Reassessment""