|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910455479003321 |
|
|
Autore |
Bieler Andreas <1967, > |
|
|
Titolo |
Globalisation and enlargement of the European union : Austrian and Swedish social forces in the struggle over membership / / Andreas Bieler |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
London ; ; New York : , : Routledge, , 2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-134-61422-5 |
1-280-33552-1 |
0-203-46124-X |
0-203-25322-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (209 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Routledge/Warwick studies in globalisation ; ; 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Electronic books. |
Austria Economic conditions 1945- |
Sweden Economic conditions 1945- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Book Cover; Title; Contents; List of tables; Foreword; Acknowledgements; List of abbreviations; Introduction: theories of integration and Austria's and Sweden's accession to the European Union; a critique and alternative; Austria and Sweden in an era of global structural change; Social forces and the struggle for application in Austria and Sweden; The conflict over the EU referenda in Austria and Sweden; Austria's and Sweden's accession to the EU and the changing security structure; The future enlargement of the EU towards Central and Eastern Europe |
Conclusions: globalisation, EU enlargement and the limits of neo-liberalismNotes; Bibliography; Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
On January 1 1995, Austria and Sweden joined the European Union (EU). This book examines why these two countries joined at such a moment and studies their accession against the structural background of globalization. In this cutting-edge analysis, Andreas Bieler argues that conventional neo-functionalist and intergovernmentalist theories fail to explain such structural change as they take existing power |
|
|
|
|