|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910455291303321 |
|
|
Autore |
Gaus Caroline |
|
|
Titolo |
Etiam realis scientia [[electronic resource] ] : Petrus Aureolis konzeptualistische Transzendentalienlehre vor dem Hintergrund seiner Kritik am Formalitätenrealismus / / von Caroline Gaus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Leiden ; ; Boston, : Brill, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-282-39964-0 |
9786612399640 |
90-474-4367-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (328 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, , 0169-8028 ; ; Bd. 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Transcendentals |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. [297]-304) and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Vorläufige Material / C.F. Gaus -- 1. Einleitung / C.F. Gaus -- 2. Die INNere Spannung der scotischen Metaphysikkonzeption: Die Syste Matische Bedeutung des Formalitätenrealismus für die Transzenden Talienlehre / C.F. Gaus -- 3. Die ontologischen Prämissen einer formalistischen Transzendentalienlehre / C.F. Gaus -- 4. Aureolis Konzeptualistische Interpretation der Transzendentalien / C.F. Gaus -- 5. Schluß / C.F. Gaus -- Quellen- Und literaturverzeichnis / C.F. Gaus -- Index nominum / C.F. Gaus -- Index rerum / C.F. Gaus -- Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters / C.F. Gaus. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Research on the medieval doctrine of the transcendentals is still characterized by one debate: its characteristic peculiarity vs. its structural correspondence to the modern concept of transcendentality. The present study on Peter Aureol’s († 1322) doctrine of transcendentals offers a contribution to that discussion by delimiting from both directions: by developing Aureol’s position in contrast to the contemporary position of a scotist-orientated, formalistic realism, it sheds light on the innovative traits in his doctrine. On the other hand, Aureol’s logico-semantical revision of metaphysics is presented as an intentional affirmation of tradition, so that a revised view can be taken |
|
|
|
|