|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910454974703321 |
|
|
Autore |
Shapiro Martin M |
|
|
Titolo |
On law, politics, and judicialization [[electronic resource] /] / Martin Shapiro and Alec Stone Sweet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Oxford ; ; New York, : Oxford University Press, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-19-160023-7 |
9786612007217 |
1-282-00721-1 |
0-19-153137-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (430 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Law - Political aspects |
Courts |
Sociological jurisprudence |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. [376]-405) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
""Acknowledgements""; ""Contents""; ""List of Figures""; ""List of Tables""; ""1. Law, Courts, and Social Science""; ""Political Jurisprudence""; ""Judicialization and the Construction of Governance""; ""2. Judicial Law-making and Precedent""; ""Towards a Theory of Stare Decisis""; ""Path Dependence, Precedent, and Judicial Power""; ""3. Constitutional Judicial Review""; ""The Success of Judicial Review and Democracy""; ""Constitutional Politics in France and Germany""; ""4. Testing, Comparison, Prediction""; ""The Giving Reasons Requirement""; ""The European Court and Integration"" |
""5. Judges and Company""""Globalization of Freedom of Contract""; ""Islands of Transnational Governance""; ""6. Abstract Review and Judicial Law-making""; ""Abstract and Concrete Review in the United States""; ""References""; ""Index""; ""A""; ""B""; ""C""; ""D""; ""E""; ""F""; ""G""; ""H""; ""I""; ""J""; ""K""; ""L""; ""M""; ""N""; ""O""; ""P""; ""Q""; ""R""; ""S""; ""T""; ""U""; ""V""; ""W"" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Two leading political scientists present the best of their research, focusing on how to build and test a social science of law and courts. |
|
|
|
|