|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910454926503321 |
|
|
Autore |
Berman David |
|
|
Titolo |
George Berkeley [[electronic resource] ] : idealism and the man / / david Berman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Oxford [England], : Clarendon Press, 1993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-280-32277-2 |
0-203-41380-6 |
0-203-31552-9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (244 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Philosophy, Modern |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Front Cover; George Berkeley Alciphron in Focus; Copyright Page; Contents; Acknowledgements; Introduction: David Berman; Alciphron: George Berkeley; The First Dialogue; The Third Dialogue; The Fourth Dialogue; The Seventh Dialogue; From Divine Analogy (1733): Peter Browne; 'Additions and Corrections' from Inquiry into Beauty and Virtue (1738): Francis Hutcheson; From Philosophical Works (1754): Lord Bolingbroke; From 'Berkeley's Life and Writings' (1871): J.S. Mill; From English Thought in the Eighteenth Century (1876): Leslie Stephen; Berkeley on beauty: J.O.Urmson |
Berkeley's divine language argument: A.David KlineCognitive theology and emotive mysteries in Berkeley's Alciphron: David Berman; Was Berkeley a precursor of Wittgenstein?: Antony Flew; Bibliography; Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Alciphron, or the Minute Philosopher (1732) is Berkeley's main work of philosophical theology and a crucial source of his views on meaning and language. This edition contains the four most important dialogues and a selection of critical essays and commentaries reflecting the response of such writers as Hutcheson, Mill and Antony Flew. The only single edition currently in print, it argues that Alciphron has a more important place both in the Berkeley canon and in early modern philosophy than is generally thought. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|