|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910454535103321 |
|
|
Autore |
Lai Karyn <1964-> |
|
|
Titolo |
An introduction to Chinese philosophy / / Karyn L. Lai [[electronic resource]] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-107-17550-X |
0-511-80083-5 |
0-511-42172-9 |
0-511-42238-5 |
0-511-64998-3 |
0-511-42304-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (xiv, 307 pages) : digital, PDF file(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Cambridge introductions to philosophy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Chinese philosophy -- Confucius and the Confucian concepts ren and li -- The cultivation of humanity in Confucian philosophy : Mencius and Xunzi -- Early Mohist philosophy -- Early Daoist philosophy : The Dao De Jing as a metaphysical treatise -- Early Daoist philosophy : dao, language and society -- The Mingjia and the later Mohists -- Zhuangzi's philosophy -- Legalist philosophy -- The Yijing and its place in Chinese philosophy -- Chinese Buddhism. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This comprehensive introductory textbook to early Chinese philosophy covers a range of philosophical traditions which arose during the Spring and Autumn (722-476 BCE) and Warring States (475-221 BCE) periods in China, including Confucianism, Mohism, Daoism, and Legalism. It considers concepts, themes and argumentative methods of early Chinese philosophy and follows the development of some ideas in subsequent periods, including the introduction of Buddhism into China. The book examines key issues and debates in early Chinese philosophy, cross-influences between its traditions and interpretations by scholars up to the present day. The discussion draws upon both primary texts and secondary sources, and there are suggestions for |
|
|
|
|