1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910453875903321

Autore

Hamilton Daniel W

Titolo

The limits of sovereignty [[electronic resource] ] : property confiscation in the Union and the Confederacy during the Civil War / / Daniel W. Hamilton

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Chicago, : University of Chicago Press, 2007

ISBN

1-281-95706-2

9786611957063

0-226-31486-3

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (240 p.)

Disciplina

973.7/1

Soggetti

Enemy property - United States - History - Civil War, 1861-1865

Electronic books.

United States History Civil War, 1861-1865 Law and legislation

United States History Civil War, 1861-1865 Confiscations and contributions

United States History Civil War, 1861-1865 Claims

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references (p. [173]-215) and index.

Nota di contenuto

Legislative property confiscation before the Civil War -- Radical property confiscation in the Thirty-seventh Congress -- The conservative assault on confiscation -- The moderate coup -- The Confederate Sequestration Act -- The ordeal of sequestration -- Civil War confiscation in the reconstruction supreme court -- The limits of sovereignty.

Sommario/riassunto

Americans take for granted that government does not have the right to permanently seize private property without just compensation. Yet for much of American history, such a view constituted the weaker side of an ongoing argument about government sovereignty and individual rights. What brought about this drastic shift in legal and political thought? Daniel W. Hamilton locates that change in the crucible of the Civil War. In the early days of the war, Congress passed the First and Second Confiscation Acts, authorizing the Union to seize private property in the rebellious states of the Confederacy, and the



Confederate Congress responded with the broader Sequestration Act. The competing acts fueled a fierce, sustained debate among legislators and lawyers about the principles underlying alternative ideas of private property and state power, a debate which by 1870 was increasingly dominated by today's view of more limited government power. Through its exploration of this little-studied consequence of the debates over confiscation during the Civil War, The Limits of Sovereignty will be essential to an understanding of the place of private property in American law and legal history.