| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910453760203321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Radical interactionism on the rise / / edited by Lonnie H. Athens ; managing editor Ted Faust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
London : , : Emerald, , 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[First edition.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (259 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Studies in symbolic interaction ; ; volume 41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Social interaction |
Symbolic interactionism |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
FRONT COVER; RADICAL INTERACTIONISM ON THE RISE; COPYRIGHT PAGE; CONTENTS; LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS; RADICAL INTERACTIONISM; ''RADICAL'' AND ''SYMBOLIC'' INTERACTIONISM: DEMARCATING THEIR BORDERS; MAJOR THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ''RADICAL'' AND ''SYMBOLIC'' INTERACTIONISM; CONCLUSION; NOTES; ACKNOWLEDGMENT; REFERENCES; MEAD'S CONCEPTION OF THE SOCIAL ACT: A RADICAL INTERACTIONIST'S CRITIQUE; INTRODUCTION; MEAD'S ANALYSIS OF THE SOCIAL ACT; CRITIQUE OF MEAD'S ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL ACT; DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY; CONCLUSION; ACKNOWLEDGMENT; REFERENCES |
TOWARD A RADICAL INTERACTIONIST ACCOUNT OF SCIENCEINTRODUCTION; MEAD'S SOCIAL VISION OF SCIENCE; LONNIE ATHENS' RADICAL INTERACTIONISM; SCIENCE AS A FIELD OF STRUGGLE; THE HETEROGENEITY OF DOMINATION AND THE MANGLE OF SCIENTIFIC PRACTICE; CONCLUSION: RADICALIZING MEAD'S MODEL OF SCIENCE; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS; REFERENCES; DOMINATION AND RESISTANCE: THE POLITICAL THEORY OF JOHN DEWEY; INTRODUCTION AND RATIONALE; THE RADICAL TURN IN INTERACTIONISM: A BRIEF REVIEW OF RECENT HISTORY; DEWEY'S SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXTS; GENERAL THEMES IN THE RADICAL POLITICAL THEORY OF JOHN DEWEY |
DEWEY AND MARX: A BRIEF REVIEWDOMINATION, SUBORDINATION, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AND MASTER-SLAVE SOCIAL RELATIONS; CONCLUSION; NOTES; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS; REFERENCES; REVISITING LEARNING TO LABOR: INTERACTION, DOMINATION, RESISTANCE AND THE 'GRIND'; THE STUDY AND ITS RECEPTION - WHY REVISIT LEARNING TO LABOR?; THE SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONIST READINGS; STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF THE DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS; EXTENDING RADICAL INTERACTIONISM: THE GRIND, DEFERENCE, AND DEMEANOR; CONCLUSION; NOTES; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS; REFERENCES |
DOMINANCE, DEFERENCE, AND DEMEANOR IN MAD MEN: TOWARD A CONVERGENCE OF RADICAL INTERACTIONISM AND RADICAL DRAMATURGYDOMINATION, DEFERENCE, AND DEMEANOR; DOMINATION, DEFERENCE, AND DEMEANOR IN MAD MEN; THE TEMPORAL GROUNDS OF DOMINATION; CONSUMMATION OF DOMINATION AND DEFERENCE IN MAD MEN; CONCLUSION: MERGING RADICAL INTERACTIONISM WITH DRAMATURGY; REFERENCES; REFLECTIONS ON POWER AND INTERSECTIONALITY; INTRODUCTION; AUTOETHNOGRAPHIC REFLECTIONS ON DOMINATION, POWER AND PEDAGOGY; PRIVILEGE AND FEMINISMS; CONCLUSION: POSSIBLE NEW APPLICATIONS; REFERENCES |
THE BEST ROAD FOR PRAGMATISM: NEO-PRAGMATISM OR RADICAL INTERACTIONISM?BACKGROUND AND PROBLEM STATEMENT; PURPOSE; EPISTEMOLOGY IN NEOPRAGMATISM AND RADICAL INTERACTIONISM; IMPLICATIONS FOR INQUIRY OF NEOPRAGMATISM AND RADICAL INTERACTIONISM; POLITICS IN NEOPRAGMATISM AND RADICAL INTERACTIONISM; DISCUSSION; CONCLUSION; REFERENCES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This issue focuses on ""radical interactionism,"" which recent emergence as an alternative perspective to conventional symbolic interactionism has sparked fierce debate in both North America and Europe. Lonnie Athens discusses the four fundamental differences between radical and conventional symbolic interactionism. The prominent scholars compare the relative insights offered not only between radical interactionism and symbolic interactionism, but between radical interactionism and feminism, dramaturgy, critical studies, and neo-pragmatism. Without exception, they found the radical interaction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |