|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910453663303321 |
|
|
Autore |
Lyons William John |
|
|
Titolo |
Canon and exegesis [[electronic resource] ] : canonical praxis and the Sodom narrative / / William John Lyons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
London ; ; New York, : Sheffield Academic Press, c2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-281-84192-7 |
9786611841928 |
0-567-40343-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (328 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Journal for the study of the Old Testament. Supplement series ; ; 352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Hermeneutics |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographic references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Contents; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Introduction; Chapter 1 THE HISTORY OF BIBLICAL THEOLOGY AND ITS TEXT(S); Chapter 2 AN OUTLINE OF THE CANONICAL APPROACH OF BREVARD S. CHILDS; Chapter 3 THE HERMENEUTICS OF THE CANONICAL APPROACH RECONSIDERED; Chapter 4 PRELIMINARIES TO A CANONICAL EXEGESIS OF GENESIS 18-19; Chapter 5 A CANONICAL EXEGESIS OF THE 'SODOM NARRATIVE', PART 1: GENESIS 18; Chapter 6 A CANONICAL EXEGESIS OF THE 'SODOM NARRATIVE', PART 2: GENESIS 19; Conclusion: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE CANONICAL APPROACH; Select Bibliography of the Work of Brevard Springs Childs |
General BibliographyIndex of References; Index of Authors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Previous attempts to critique the canonical approach of Brevard Childs have remained largely theoretical in nature. One of the weakness of canonical criticism, then, is its failure to have generated new readings of extended biblical passages. Reviewing the hermeneutics and the praxis of Childs' approach, Lyons then turns to the Sodom narrative (Gen 18-19) as a test of a practical exegesis according to Childs' principles, and then to reflect critically upon the reading experience generated. Surprisingly, the canonical reading produced is a wholly new |
|
|
|
|