|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910452959603321 |
|
|
Autore |
Stephens Anne |
|
|
Titolo |
Ecofeminism and systems thinking / / Anne Stephens |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York : , : Routledge, , 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-138-95282-6 |
1-135-02230-5 |
0-203-76728-4 |
1-135-02231-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[First edition.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (162 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Routledge Research in Gender and Society ; ; Volume 36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Ecofeminism |
Social ecology |
Critical thinking |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Cover; Title Page; Copyright Page; Dedication; Table of Contents; List of Figures and Pictures ; List of Tables ; Preface; Acknowledgments ; PART A; 1 Introduction ; 2 Ecofeminism and Systems Theory ; 3 Comparing and Contrasting Ecofeminism and Systems Thinking ; 4 Principles of Feminist-Systems Thinking ; PART B; 5 Case Study 1: Exploring FST Principles in Community Development-The Carrot on a Stick Early Health Intervention Program ; 6 Case Study 2: The Yarrabah Kinship Gardens ; 7 Case Study 3: Evaluating Changes-Community Awareness Growth and Change |
8 Case Study 4: Greening the Economy-Mapping and Identifying Ways to Transform a Regional Economy 9 Drawing Conclusions and the Value of the Feminist-Systems Thinking Framework ; Notes; References ; Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book brings together two vitally important strands of 20th-century thinking to establish a set of simple and elegant principles for planning, project design and evaluation. It explains the backgrounds of cultural ecofeminism and critical systems thinking, and what we find when they are systematically compared. Both theories share a range of |
|
|
|
|