| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910452955603321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Institutional logics in action [[electronic resource] ] . Part B / / edited by Eva Boxenbaum, Michael Lounsbury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Bradford, : Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (395 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Research in the sociology of organizations ; ; v. 39B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
LounsburyMichael |
BoxenbaumEva |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Organizational sociology |
Logic |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
FRONT COVER; INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS IN ACTION, PART B; COPYRIGHT PAGE; CONTENTS; LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS; ADVISORY BOARD; INSTITUTIONAL COMPLEXITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSES; EMBEDDED IN HYBRID CONTEXTS: HOW INDIVIDUALS IN ORGANIZATIONS RESPOND TO COMPETING INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS; HOW DO INDIVIDUALS EXPERIENCE COMPETING INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS?; INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL RESPONSES TO EMBEDDEDNESS IN COMPETING INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS; DISCUSSION; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; REFERENCES; INSTITUTIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY: LEVERAGING INSTITUTIONAL COMPLEXITY IN PRACTICE; INTRODUCTION; INSTITUTIONAL COMPLEXITY: THE STORY SO FAR |
AMBIDEXTERITY IN THE STRATEGY LITERATURE: A FALSE PROMISE FULFILLING THE PROMISE: INSTITUTIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY IN PRACTICE; CONCLUSION; REFERENCES; BEYOND THE FAMILY FIRM: REASSERTING THE INFLUENCE OF THE FAMILY INSTITUTIONAL LOGIC ACROSS ORGANIZATIONS; INTRODUCTION; THEORETICAL OVERVIEW; THE ILLUSTRATIVE CASE OF ITALY AND THE ITALIAN LEGAL SECTOR; DISCUSSION; CONCLUSIONS; NOTE; REFERENCES; PUTTING NEW WINE IN OLD BOTTLES: UTILIZING RHETORICAL HISTORY TO OVERCOME STIGMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSOCIATED WITH A PREVIOUSLY DOMINANT LOGIC; THEORETICAL BACKGROUND; METHODS; FINDINGS; DISCUSSION; CONCLUSION; NOTES |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT REFERENCES; APPENDIX: KEY TERMS IN RHETORICAL ANALYSIS; IMAGERIES OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: VISUAL RECONTEXTUALIZATION AND FIELD-LEVEL MEANING; INTRODUCTION; THE ROLE OF VISUALS IN MEANING CONSTRUCTION; THE ARCHITECTURE OF DISCOURSE; PHENOMENON AND EMPIRICAL CONTEXT; EMPIRICAL DESIGN; THE VISUAL DISCOURSE OF CSR IN AUSTRIA: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION; CONCLUSION AND CONTRIBUTION; NOTES; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; REFERENCES; APPENDIX: TOPOI AND ILLUSTRATIVE IMAGES; LOGIC PLURALISM, ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN, AND PRACTICE ADOPTION: THE STRUCTURAL EMBEDDEDNESS OF CSR PROGRAMS |
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK: RELATING INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS TO ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN AND PRACTICES RESEARCH METHODS; RESULTS; DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; REFERENCES; STRANGE BREW: BRIDGING LOGICS VIA INSTITUTIONAL BRICOLAGE AND THE RECONSTITUTION OF ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTITY; INSTITUTIONAL BRICOLAGE AND IDENTITY RECONSTITUTION; THE SETTING; INSTITUTIONAL BRICOLAGE: BRIDGING LOGICS AND RECONSTITUTING IDENTITY INSIDE AN ORGANIZATION; DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION; NOTES; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; REFERENCES |
INSTANTIATION OF INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS: THE ''BUSINESS CASE'' FOR DIVERSITY AND THE PREVALENCE OF DIVERSITY MENTORING PRACTICES LOGICS, ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, AND PRACTICES; ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS AND PRACTICE VARIATION; METHODS; RESULTS; DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION; CONCLUSION; NOTES; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; REFERENCES; THE INTERNAL COMPLEXITY OF MARKET LOGICS: FINANCIAL SOPHISTICATION AND PRICE DETERMINATION; PRICE THEORY AND MARKET HOMOGENEITY; INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS AND MARKET HETEROGENEITY; METHODOLOGY; STUDY FINDINGS; DISCUSSION AND FUTURE RESEARCH; DATA GATHERING AND INTERVIEW EFFECTS |
DATA ANALYSIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The Institutional Logics Perspective is one of the fastest growing new theoretical areas in organization studies (Thornton, Ocasio & Lounsbury, 2012). Building on early efforts by Friedland & Alford (1991) to ""bring society back in"" to the study of organizational dynamics, this new scholarly domain has revived institutional analysis by embracing a focus on the dynamic and heterogeneous nature of institutions. In doing so, it has embraced a more practice-centered approach to agency that emphasizes situated interactions, the importance of history, the role of both symbolic and material eleme |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |