| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910452953903321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Institutional logics in action [[electronic resource] /] / edited by Michael Lounsbury, Eva Boxenbaum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Bradford, : Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (323 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Research in the sociology of organizations ; ; v. 39A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
LounsburyMichael |
BoxenbaumEva |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Logic |
Organizational sociology |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
FRONT COVER; INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS IN ACTION, PART A; COPYRIGHT PAGE; CONTENTS; LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS; ADVISORY BOARD; INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL 2 VOLUME SET; INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS IN ACTION; INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS: FROM CRITIQUE TO MAINSTREAM PERSPECTIVE; PAPERS IN THIS SPECIAL DOUBLE VOLUME; CONCLUDING THOUGHTS; NOTE; REFERENCES; META-THEORETICAL ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES; GOD, LOVE, AND OTHER GOOD REASONS FOR PRACTICE: THINKING THROUGH INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS; ORIGINS; MAX WEBER'S VALUE SPHERES AND INSTITUTIONAL THEORY; THE NATURE OF INSTITUTIONAL DEITIES |
VALUES, SUBSTANCES, AND INSTITUTIONAL GODS STRATEGIC ACTION FIELDS; THE CONVENTION OF WORLDS; LOVE AND THE INSTITUTIONAL LIFE OF MORTAL GODS; NOTES; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; REFERENCES; THE IMMATERIALITY OF MATERIAL PRACTICES IN INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS; METHODS: A VOCABULARY APPROACH TO ANALYZING DIMENSIONS OF INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS; FINDINGS: VOCABULARY FREQUENCY IN DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS OF INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS; METHODS: A VOCABULARY APPROACH TO ANALYZING DIMENSIONS OF INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS; FINDINGS: VOCABULARY FREQUENCY IN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS OF INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS |
BRINGING MATERIAL BACK IN TO INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS: A WAY FORWARD CONCLUSION; REFERENCES; INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS AND INSTITUTIONAL WORK: SHOULD THEY BE AGREED?; BRINGING MATERIAL BACK IN TO INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS: A WAY FORWARD; CONCLUSION; REFERENCES; APPENDIX A: 16 ARTICLES WITH VOCABULARY OF ''INSTITUTIONAL LOGIC*'' AND ''MATERIAL*,'' CITING FRIEDLAND AND ALFORD (1991) WITH 200 OR MORE GOOGLE SCHOLAR CITATIONS; APPENDIX B: KEY TERMS FOR COGNITIVE, NORMATIVE, AND MATERIAL DIMENSIONS OF INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS; INSTITUTIONAL LOGIC PROCESSES |
A TALE OF TWO COUNTRIES: HOW DIFFERENT CONSTELLATIONS OF LOGICS IMPACT ACTION THEORETICAL BACKGROUND; RESEARCH SETTINGS; METHODOLOGY; CONSTELLATIONS OF LOGICS AND ACTION; ACTION IN LIGHT OF CONSTELLATIONS OF LOGICS; DISCUSSION; CONCLUSIONS; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; REFERENCES; PROCESSES FOR RETRENCHING LOGICS: THE ALBERTA OIL SANDS CASE, 2008-2011; THEORY; METHOD; RESULTS; DISCUSSION; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; NOTES; REFERENCES; APPENDIX; INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS AS STRATEGIC RESOURCES; THE LOGICS OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN; COMBINING OR ABANDONING A LOGIC FOR MANAGERIALISM?; METHODS; RESULTS; DISCUSSION; NOTES |
REFERENCES APPENDIX A: LIST OF INTERVIEWEES (FOR MORE DETAILS, SEE SZOSTAK, 2006); LIST OF INTERVIEWS OF 13 MONTREAL DESIGN EXPERTS (APRIL 2005); APPENDIX B: HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF FRENCH INDUSTRIAL DESIGN; APPENDIX C: CODING OF EXPERTISE; FROM AGENTS TO PRINCIPLES: THE CHANGING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HOSPITALIST IDENTITY AND LOGICS OF HEALTH CARE; INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS AND COLLECTIVE IDENTITIES; METHODOLOGY AND METHODS; HISTORICAL AND ANALYTICAL NARRATIVE: HOSPITALISTS AND THE DECLINE OF THE MANAGED-CARE LOGIC; THEORIZING THE DYNAMICS OF LOGICS AND IDENTITIES; CONCLUDING REMARKS; REFERENCES |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The Institutional Logics Perspective is one of the fastest growing new theoretical areas in organization studies (Thornton, Ocasio & Lounsbury, 2012). Building on early efforts by Friedland & Alford (1991) to ""bring society back in"" to the study of organizational dynamics, this new scholarly domain has revived institutional analysis by embracing a focus on the dynamic and heterogeneous nature of institutions. In doing so, it has embraced a more practice-centered approach to agency that emphasizes situated interactions, the importance of history, the role of both symbolic and material elementary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |