1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910452876403321

Autore

Noriega-Olmos Simón <1974->

Titolo

Aristotle's Psychology of Signification [[electronic resource] ] : a commentary on "De Interpretatione" 16a 3-18 / / Simon Noriega-Olmos

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Berlin ; ; Boston, : De Gruyter, 2013

ISBN

3-11-028987-3

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (196 p.)

Collana

Beiträge zur Altertumskunde ; ; 303

Beiträge zur Altertumskunde ; ; Bd. 303

Classificazione

CD 2067

Disciplina

160

Soggetti

Signification (Logic) in literature

Psychology in literature

Greek literature - History and criticism

Electronic books.

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Frontmatter -- Preface -- Contents -- Introduction -- 1 Φωνή -- 2 Σημεῖον -- 3 The Significatum -- 4 Νοήματα in De Interpretatione and De Anima, a New Interpretation of De Interpretatione 16a3–8 -- 5 Κατὰ Συνθήκην -- Concluding Remarks -- Bibliography -- Name index

Sommario/riassunto

This book reconstructs the theory of signification implicit in Aristotle’s De Interpretatione and its psychological background in his writing De Anima, a project often envisioned by scholars but never systematically undertaken. I begin by explaining what sort of phonetic material, according to Aristotle, can be a significans and a phônê. To that end, I provide a physiological account of which animal sounds count as phônê, as well as a psychological evaluation of the cognitive content of the phônai under consideration in De Interpretatione: names, verbs, and assertive sentences. I then turn to noêmata, which, for Aristotle, are the psychological reference and significata of names, verbs and assertive sentences. I explain what, for Aristotle, are the logical properties a significatum must have in order to be signified by the phonetic material of a name, verb or assertive sentence, and why noêmata can fulfil those logical conditions. Finally, I elucidate the



significans-significatum relation without making use of the modern semantic triangle. This approach is consonant with Aristotle’s methodology and breaks new ground by exploring the connection between the linguistic and psychological aspects of Aristotle’s theory of signification.