1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910452145203321

Autore

Wittern-Keller Laura <1951->

Titolo

Freedom of the screen [[electronic resource] ] : legal challenges to state film censorship, 1915-1981 / / Laura Wittern-Keller

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Lexington, Ky., : University Press of Kentucky, c2008

ISBN

0-8131-3840-X

0-8131-3490-0

1-283-23318-5

9786613233189

0-8131-7264-0

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (369 p.)

Disciplina

344.7305/31

Soggetti

Motion pictures - Censorship - United States - History

Motion pictures - Law and legislation - United States

Motion picture industry - Law and legislation - United States

Electronic books.

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references (p. 331-341) and index.

Nota di contenuto

Front cover; Copyright; Contents; Preface and Acknowledgments; Introduction; 1. The Origins of Governmental Film Censorship, 1907-1923; 2. The Courts Provide No Relief, 1909-1927; 3. Hollywood and the Legion of Decency, 1922-1934; 4. Early Challenges to State Censors, 1927-1940; 5. The First Amendment Resurfaces, 1946-1950; 6. The Strange Case of The Miracle, 1950-1952; 7. La Ronde, 1951-1954; 8. The Tide Turns against the Censors, 1953-1957; 9. The Seventh Case in Seven Years, 1957-1959; 10. The Curtain Coming Down, 1957-1964; 11. Fight for Freedom of the Screen, 1962-1965

12. Denouement, 1965-1981Conclusion; Notes; Selected Bibliography; Index

Sommario/riassunto

Between 1907 and 1980, many state and local governments empowered motion picture censor boards with the legal authority to keep any movie they considered obscene, indecent, or harmful from being shown. Although the mainstream American film industry accepted the form of censorship known as ""prior restraint,"" the



independent distributors and exhibitors challenged the government censors in court. In Freedom of the Screen, Laura Wittern-Keller tells the story of those who fought prior restraint on movies. By drawing attention to this inequity -- film was the only medium so constricted by the