Visual versions [[electronic resource] /] / Robert Schwartz

• Record Nr.: UNINA9910452143603321
• Autore: Schwartz Robert <1940->
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: Cambridge, Mass., : MIT Press, c2006
• ISBN: 1-282-09814-4; 9786612098147; 0-262-28330-1; 1-4294-1310-7
• Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (278 p.)
• Disciplina: 121/.35
• Soggetti: Vision; Visual perception; Electronic books.
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Note generali: "A Bradford book."
• Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.
• Nota di contenuto: Introduction -- ; 1 Seeing distance from a Berkeleian perspective -- ; 2 Size -- ; 3 Making maximum sense of "minimum sensible" -- ; 4 Heterogeneity and the senses -- ; 5 What Berkeley sees in the man born blind -- ; 6 The role of inference in vision -- ; 7 Making occlusion more transparent -- ; 8 Directed perception -- ; 9 Representation and resemblance -- ; 10 Pictures, puzzles, and paradigms -- ; 11 Vision and cognition in picture perception -- ; 12 The concept of an "object" in perception and cognition -- ; 13 Avoiding errors about errors -- ; 14 Pluralist perspectives on perceptual error -- ; 15 An Austinian look at the "objects of perception."
• Sommario/riassunto: These essays by Robert Schwartz on topics in the theory of vision are written from a pragmatic perspective. The issues and arguments will interest both philosophers and psychologists, covering new ground and bridging gaps between these disciplines. Schwartz begins historically, with discussions of problems raised and solutions offered in Bishop Berkeley's writings on vision, presenting Berkeley's views on spatial perception and the qualitative aspects of sensory experience in the context of recent theoretical and empirical work in vision theory. Schwartz then turns to debates in both the philosophical and ; psychological literature over the view that perception is inferential and thus "indirect." Critically surveying competing characterizations of the idea of "inferential processes" he argues the need either to reframe radically the question or drop the issue. Next, Schwartz discusses pictorial representation and research on picture perception. Drawing on the work of Nelson Goodman, Schwartz explains and defends the advantages of a symbolic approach to both topics. Finally, he examines the quagmires that often develop when metaphysical concerns about the "real" and our ability to perceive it infect discussions and claims in the theory of vision. After analyzing issues arising in current psychological research on "object" perception, Schwartz turns to debates over the supposed essential nature of colors. An appreciation of the empirical and theoretical work on color perception suggests that there is no single or privileged analysis of the notion of "real colors." Schwartz circles back in the end to what he calls "that old chestnut of the philosophy of perception"--controversies over "the objects of perception"--and takes an Austinian look at the topic.