|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910451980403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Teevan Donna <1960-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Lonergan, hermeneutics & theological method [[electronic resource] /] / by Donna Teevan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Milwaukee, WI, : Marquette University Press, c2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-87462-940-3 |
1-4356-1041-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (226 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Marquette studies in theology ; ; 45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Theology - Methodology |
Hermeneutics - Religious aspects - Catholic Church |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. [213]-219) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
short title page; title page Lonergan, Hermeneutics, & Theological Method by Donna Teevan; copyright page; dedication; Acknowledgements; Table of Contents; 1 Philosophical Hermeneutics and Theology; 2 The Relationship between Transcendental and Hermeneutical Approaches to Theology; 3 Lonergan's Hermeneutics; 4 The Interpretation of Texts; 5 History and Historicity; 6 Conclusion: Lonergan's Transcendental Method as a Hermeneutical Approach to Theology; Bibliography; Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book argues that Bernard Lonergan's transcendental method offers an approach to theology that is in some sense hermeneutical. Many would consider such a project surprising, given the debate that has arisen between those who advocate a transcendental approach to theology and those who contend that a hermeneutical approach furnishes a more adequate theological method in the light of contemporary intellectual developments. This book brings into relief the features of Lonergan's transcendental method that make any polarization of the two approaches questionable. Ultimately, what I offer is an |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|