| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910450401403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Blood Sylvia K. <1957-, > |
|
|
Titolo |
Body work : the social construction of women's body image / / Sylvia K. Blood |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York : , : Routledge, , 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-134-48359-7 |
1-134-48360-0 |
1-280-18044-7 |
0-203-49510-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (161 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Women and psychology Body work |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Body image in women |
Women - Psychology |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Book Cover; Title; Copyright; CONTENTS; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS; INTRODUCTION; 1 EXPERIMENTAL BODY IMAGE RESEARCH; 2 CRITIQUE OF BODY IMAGE RESEARCH; 3 DISCURSIVE CONSTITUTION OF THE BODY; 4 'WHAT OTHER WOMEN LOOK LIKE NAKED' – READING A POPULAR WOMEN'S MAGAZINE; 5 PRACTICES OF SUBJECTIFICATION – 'BODY IMAGE' DISCOURSE IN POPULAR WOMEN'S MAGAZINES; 6 BODY IMAGE TALK – ONE WOMAN'S ACCOUNT OF HER EXPERIENCES; 7 CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS – FROM THEORY TO CLINICAL PRACTICE; REFERENCES; INDEX; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Experimental psychology formulates and resolves research questions about 'body image' in terms of the pathology of particular women. What it does not focus on, however, are the discursive practices at work in its own assumptions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910792700603321 |
|
|
Autore |
Badesa Calixto |
|
|
Titolo |
The birth of model theory [[electronic resource] ] : Löwenheim's theorem in the frame of the theory of relatives / / Calixto Badesa ; translated by Michael Maudsley ; revised by the author |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Princeton, N.J. ; ; Oxford, : Princeton University Press, c2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-282-60793-6 |
9786612607936 |
1-4008-2618-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[Course Book] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (255 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Logic, Symbolic and mathematical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- Chapter 1. Algebra of Classes and Propositional Calculus -- Chapter 2. The Theory of Relatives -- Chapter 3. Changing the Order of Quantifiers -- Chapter 4. The Löwenheim Normal Form -- Chapter 5. Preliminaries to Löwenheim's Theorem -- Chapter 6. Löwenheim's Theorem -- Appendix. First-Order Logic with Fleeing Indices -- References -- Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Löwenheim's theorem reflects a critical point in the history of mathematical logic, for it marks the birth of model theory--that is, the part of logic that concerns the relationship between formal theories and their models. However, while the original proofs of other, comparably significant theorems are well understood, this is not the case with Löwenheim's theorem. For example, the very result that scholars attribute to Löwenheim today is not the one that Skolem--a logician raised in the algebraic tradition, like Löwenheim--appears to have attributed to him. In The Birth of Model Theory, Calixto Badesa provides both the first sustained, book-length analysis of Löwenheim's proof and a detailed description of the theoretical framework--and, in particular, of the algebraic tradition--that made the theorem possible. Badesa's three main conclusions amount to a completely new interpretation of the proof, one that sharply contradicts the core of modern scholarship on the topic. First, Löwenheim did not use an |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
infinitary language to prove his theorem; second, the functional interpretation of Löwenheim's normal form is anachronistic, and inappropriate for reconstructing the proof; and third, Löwenheim did not aim to prove the theorem's weakest version but the stronger version Skolem attributed to him. This book will be of considerable interest to historians of logic, logicians, philosophers of logic, and philosophers of mathematics. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |