| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910450115203321 |
|
|
Autore |
Linville Susan E |
|
|
Titolo |
Feminism, Film, Fascism : Women's Autobiographical Film in Postwar Germany [[electronic resource]] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Austin, TX, USA, : University of Texas Press, 19980401 |
|
University of Texas Press |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (208 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
PERFORMING ARTS |
Film & Video / General |
Motion pictures - History - Germany |
Women in motion pictures - Psychological aspects - Germany |
Women motion picture producers and directors - Germany |
Motion pictures |
Guilt |
Music, Dance, Drama & Film |
Film |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction: Seeing Through he "Postwar" Years -- 1 Kinder, Kirche, Kino: The Optical Politics of Marianne Rosenbaum's Peppermint Peace -- 2 The mother-daughter plot in history: Helma Sander-Brahm's Germany, pale mother -- 3 Self-consuming Images: The Idenity Politics of Jutta Brückner;s Hunger Years -- 4 Rertieving History: Margarethe von Tro -- 5 The Autoethnographic aesthetic of Jeanine Meerapfel's Malou -- Epilogue -- Notes -- Filmography -- Bibliography -- Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
German society's inability and/or refusal to come to terms with its Nazi past has been analyzed in many cultural works, including the well-known books Society without the Father and The Inability to Mourn. In this pathfinding study, Susan Linville challenges the accepted wisdom of these books by focusing on a cultural realm in which mourning for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Nazi past and opposing the patriarchal and authoritarian nature of postwar German culture are central concerns—namely, women's feminist auto/biographical films of the 1970s and 1980s. After a broad survey of feminist theory, Linville analyzes five important films that reflect back on the Third Reich through the experiences of women of different ages—Marianne Rosenbaum's Peppermint Peace, Helma Sanders-Brahms's Germany, Pale Mother, Jutta Brückner's Hunger Years, Margarethe von Trotta's Marianne and Juliane, and Jeanine Meerapfel's Malou. By juxtaposing these films with the accepted theories on German culture, Linville offers a fresh appraisal not only of the films' importance but especially of their challenge to misogynist interpretations of the German failure to grieve for the horrors of its Nazi past. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNISA996466058103316 |
|
|
Titolo |
Quality of Software Architectures [[electronic resource] ] : Second International Conference on Quality of Software Architectures, QoSA 2006, Västeras, Schweden, June 27-29, 2006, Revised Papers / / edited by Christine Hofmeister, Ivica Crnkovic, Ralf H. Reussner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Berlin, Heidelberg : , : Springer Berlin Heidelberg : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed. 2006.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (X, 218 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Programming and Software Engineering ; ; 4214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Software engineering |
Computer system failures |
Computer logic |
Computer communication systems |
Computers and civilization |
Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems |
System Performance and Evaluation |
Software Engineering |
Logics and Meanings of Programs |
Computer Communication Networks |
Computers and Society |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Abstracts of the Keynotes -- Expanding the Scope of Software Product Families: Problems and Alternative Approaches -- Composing with Style – Components Meet Architecture -- Abstracts of the Tutorials -- Documentation Principles and Practices That You Can Live with -- Model-Based Software Development with Eclipse -- Software Architecture Analysis and Evaluation -- Architecture Evaluation: Selecting Alternatives -- MEMS: A Method for Evaluating Middleware Architectures -- Evaluating Alternative COTS Assemblies from Imperfect Component Information -- Managing and Applying Architectural Knowledge -- Building Up and Reasoning About Architectural Knowledge -- Managing Architectural Design Decisions for Safety-Critical Software Systems -- Architectural Evaluation: Performance Prediction -- Runtime Prediction of Queued Behaviour -- Model Transformation in Software Performance Engineering -- Processes for Supporting Architecture Quality -- Traveling Architects – A New Way of Herding Cats -- A Practical Architecture-Centric Analysis Process -- Models for Architecture Evaluation -- Embedded Systems Architecture: Evaluation and Analysis -- Parameter Dependent Performance Specifications of Software Components -- Architectural Evaluation -- Applying the ATAM to an Architecture for Decentralized Control of a Transportation System -- Towards an Integration of Standard Component-Based Safety Evaluation Techniques with SaveCCM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Although the quality of a system’s software architecture is one of the critical factors in its overall quality, the architecture is simply a means to an end, the end being the implemented system. Thus the ultimate measure of the quality of the software architecture lies in the implemented system, in how well it satis?es the system and project requirements and constraints and whether it can be maintained and evolved successfully. In order to treat design as a science rather thananart,weneedtobeabletoaddressthequalityofthesoftwarearchitecture directly, not simply as it is re?ected in the implemented system. Therefore, QoSA is concerned with software architecture quality directly by addressing the problems of: – Designing software architectures of good quality – De?ning, measuring, evaluating architecture quality – Managing architecture quality, tying it upstream to requirements and do- stream to implementation, and preserving architecture quality throughout the lifetime of the system Cross-cutting these problems is the question of the nature of software archit- ture. Software architecture organizes a system, partitioning it into elements and de?ning relationships among the elements. For this we often use multiple views, each with a di?erent organizing principle. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |