|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910450098603321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Common sense, reasoning, & rationality [[electronic resource] /] / edited by Renée Elio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York, : Oxford University Press, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-19-514767-7 |
1-280-53220-3 |
9786610532209 |
0-19-803368-0 |
1-4294-0340-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (289 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
New directions in cognitive science |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Reasoning |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
""Contents""; ""Contributors""; ""1. Issues in Commonsense Reasoning and Rationality""; ""2. Rationality and Intelligence""; ""3. The Logical Foundations of Means-End Reasoning""; ""4. Induction and Consistency""; ""5. The Logic of Ordinary Language""; ""6. Knowledge and Coherence""; ""7. The Evolutionary Roots of Intelligence and Rationality""; ""8. How Good Are Fast and Frugal Heuristics?""; ""9. Commonsense Reasoning, Logic, and Human Rationality""; ""10. Reasoning Imperialism""; ""11. Ending the Rationality Wars: How to Make Disputes about Human Rationality Disappear""; ""Name Index"" |
""A""""B""; ""C""; ""D""; ""E""; ""F""; ""G""; ""H""; ""J""; ""K""; ""L""; ""M""; ""N""; ""O""; ""P""; ""Q""; ""R""; ""S""; ""T""; ""U""; ""V""; ""W""; ""Y""; ""Z""; ""Subject Index""; ""A""; ""B""; ""C""; ""D""; ""E""; ""F""; ""G""; ""H""; ""I""; ""K""; ""L""; ""M""; ""N""; ""P""; ""Q""; ""R""; ""S""; ""T""; ""U"" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
While common sense and rationality have often been viewed as two distinct features in a unified cognitive map, this volume engages with this notion and comes up with novel and often paradoxical views of this relationship. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|