1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910449751703321

Autore

Cox Gary W.

Titolo

Elbridge Gerry's salamander : the electoral consequences of the reapportionment revolution / / Gary W. Cox, Jonathan N. Katz [[electronic resource]]

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2002

ISBN

1-107-12431-X

1-280-41921-0

0-511-17618-X

0-511-04184-5

0-511-15691-X

0-511-30429-3

0-511-60621-4

0-511-04430-5

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (xii, 234 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)

Collana

Political economy of institutions and decisions

Disciplina

328.73/07345

Soggetti

Apportionment (Election law) - United States

Election districts - United States

United States Politics and government 1945-1989

United States Politics and government 1989-

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references (p. 219-227) and indexes.

Nota di contenuto

Cover; Half-title; Series-title; Title; Copyright; Contents; List of Tables and Figures; Preface; PART I Introduction; PART II Democrats and Republicans; PART III Incumbents and Challengers; PART IV Conclusion; References; Author Index; Subject Index

Sommario/riassunto

The Supreme Court's reapportionment decisions, beginning with Baker v. Carr in 1962, had far more than jurisprudential consequences. They sparked a massive wave of extraordinary redistricting in the mid-1960s. Both state legislative and congressional districts were redrawn more comprehensively - by far - than at any previous time in America's history. Moreover, they changed what would happen at law should a state government fail to enact a new districting plan when one was



legally required. This book provides a detailed analysis of how judicial partisanship affected redistricting outcomes in the 1960s, arguing that the reapportionment revolution led indirectly to three fundamental changes in the nature of congressional elections: the abrupt eradication of a 6% pro-Republican bias in the translation of congressional votes into seats outside the south; the abrupt increase in the apparent advantage of incumbents; and the abrupt alteration of the two parties' success in congressional recruitment and elections.