1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910447052103321

Autore

Johnson Hannah R. <1974->

Titolo

Blood libel : the ritual murder accusation at the limit of Jewish history / / Hannah R. Johnson

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Ann Arbor : , : The University of Michigan Press, , c2012

ISBN

0-472-90254-7

1-282-13515-5

9786613807731

0-472-02843-X

Edizione

[1st ed.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (251 p.)

Disciplina

305.892/4009

Soggetti

Blood accusation - Europe - History

Jews - Persecutions - Europe - History

Antisemitism - Europe - History

Christianity and antisemitism

Judaism - Relations - Christianity

Christianity and other religions - Judaism

Biographies

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

The ethical dimensions of historical interpretation; the blood libel as limit case -- Thomas of Monmouth and the juridical discourse of ritual murder -- Moralization and method in Gavin Langmuir's history of antisemitism -- On being implicated: Israel Yuval and the new history of medieval Jewish-Christian relations -- Beyond implication: the Ariel Toaff affair and the question of complicity.

Sommario/riassunto

The ritual murder accusation is one of a series of myths that fall under the label blood libel, and describes the medieval legend that Jews require Christian blood for obscure religious purposes and are capable of committing murder to obtain it. This malicious myth continues to have an explosive afterlife in the public sphere, where Sarah Palin's 2011 gaffe is only the latest reminder of its power to excite controversy. Blood Libel is the first book-length study to analyze the



recent historiography of the ritual murder accusation and to consider these debates in the context of intellectual and cultural history as well as methodology. Hannah R. Johnson articulates how ethics shapes methodological decisions in the study of the accusation and how questions about methodology, in turn, pose ethical problems of interpretation and understanding.