|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910424947603321 |
|
|
Autore |
Beck Hans Peter |
|
|
Titolo |
The Economics of Big Science : Essays by Leading Scientists and Policymakers / / edited by Hans Peter Beck, Panagiotis Charitos |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Springer Nature, 2021 |
|
Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed. 2021.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (VIII, 137 p. 26 illus., 24 illus. in color.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Science Policy Reports, , 2213-1965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Nuclear physics |
Economic policy |
Space sciences |
Big data |
Capital investments |
Particle and Nuclear Physics |
R & D/Technology Policy |
Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics, Space Exploration and Astronautics) |
Big Data |
Investment Appraisal |
Conference papers and proceedings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introduction -- Towards a Sustainable European Research Infrastructures Ecosystem -- Economics of Science in the Time of Data Economy and Gigabit Society -- The SKA Approach to Sustainable Research -- The European Spallation Source: Designing a Sustainable Research Infrastructure for Europe -- Optimising the Benefits from Research Institutes -- Rethinking the Socio-economic Value of Big Science: Lessons from the FCC Study -- Socio-Economic Impact Assessments of ESA Programmes: A Brief Overview -- Designing a Socio-Economic Impact Framework for Research Infrastructures: Preliminary Lessons from the RI-PATHS Project -- Findings from the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LHC/HL-LHC Programme -- Designing a Research Infrastructure with Impact in Mind -- Leveraging the Economic Potential of FCC’s Technologies and Processes -- How to Value Public Science Employing Social Big Data? -- R&D, Innovative Collaborations and the Role of Public Policies -- Large-Scale Investment in Science: Economic Impact and Social Justice -- Investing in Fundamental Research: For Whom? A Philosopher’s Perspective -- Investing in Fundamental Research: Evaluation of the Benefits that the UK Has Derived from CERN -- Fundamental Science Drives Innovation -- Epilogue: Productive Collisions—Blue-Sky Science and Today’s Innovations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The essays in this open access volume identify the key ingredients for success in capitalizing on public investments in scientific projects and the development of large-scale research infrastructures. Investment in science – whether in education and training or through public funding for developing new research tools and technologies – is a crucial priority. Authors from big research laboratories/organizations, funding agencies and academia discuss how investing in science can produce societal benefits as well as identifying future challenges for scientists and policy makers. The volume cites different ways to assess the socio-economic impact of Research Infrastructures and their role as hubs of global collaboration, creativity and innovation. It highlights the different benefits stemming from fundamental research at the local, national and global level, while also inviting us to rethink the notion of “benefit” in the 21st century. Public investment is required to maintain the pace of technological and scientific advancements over the next decades. Far from advocating a radical transformation and massive expansion in funding, the authors suggest ways for maintaining a strong foundation of science and research to ensure that we continue to benefit from the outputs. The volume draws inspiration from the first “Economics of Big Science” workshop, held in Brussels in 2019 with the aim of creating a new space for dialogue and interaction between representatives of Big Science organizations, policy makers and academia. It aspires to provide useful reading for policy makers, scientists and students of science, who are increasingly called upon to explain the value of fundamental research and adopt the language and logic of economics when engaging in policy discussions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |