1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910377835803321

Autore

Xu Cong

Titolo

Regulatory Model for Digital Rights Management [[electronic resource] ] : Analysis of U.S., Europe and China / / by Cong Xu

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Singapore : , : Springer Singapore : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2020

ISBN

981-15-1995-1

Edizione

[1st ed. 2020.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (257 pages)

Disciplina

027

Soggetti

Private international law

Conflict of laws

Mass media

Law

Culture

Technology

Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law

IT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property

Sociology of Culture

Culture and Technology

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references.

Nota di contenuto

When Copyright Meets Technology: Digital Rights Management Infrastructure -- Legislative Architecture of Digital Rights Management Regulatory Model in U.S., E.U and China -- Predicament of Digital Rights Management Regulatory Model in China: The Untold Story -- Toward An Optimal Architecture: Reconstruction of Digital Rights Management Regulatory Model in China -- Conclusion -- List of Legislations -- Bibliography.

Sommario/riassunto

This book highlights the shortcomings of the present Digital Rights Management (DRM) regulations in China. Using literature reviews and comparative analysis from theoretical and empirical perspectives, it appraises different DRM restriction regulations and practices as well as current advice on balance of interests to analyze the dilemma faced by the DRM system. This research intends to help China establish a



comprehensive DRM regulatory model through comparative theoretical and empirical critiques of systems in America and Europe. A newly designed DRM regulatory model should be suitable for specific Chinese features, and should consist of government regulated, self-regulated, and even unregulated sections. The new regulation model might be an addition to existing legal structures, while self-regulations/social enforcement also would be as important as legislation based on case studies.