|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910377835303321 |
|
|
Autore |
Reiter Korbinian |
|
|
Titolo |
Market Design Powers of the European Commission? : Remedies under Articles 7 and 9 Regulation 1/03 / / by Korbinian Reiter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Berlin, Heidelberg : , : Springer Berlin Heidelberg : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed. 2020.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (578 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Munich Studies on Innovation and Competition, , 2199-7470 ; ; 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Commercial law |
European Economic Community |
Economic policy |
Europe - Politics and government |
European Economic Law |
Business Law |
Economic Policy |
European Politics |
European Union countries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introduction -- Prolegomena -- The relaxation of the link between harm and remedy -- The relaxation of procedural safeguards -- The impact of commitments on legal certainty -- Outlook: Discussions of reform proposals -- Summary of key findings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book provides a comprehensive analysis of the remedies practice the European Commission has adopted on the basis of articles 7 and 9 of regulation 1/03. Using article 7 as a normative benchmark, it shows that most of the criticism levelled at the Commission's article 9 decisions and the Alrosa judgment of the CJEU is not justified, since critics tend to over-state both the rigour of article 7 and the laxness of article 9. Remaining inconsistencies between the commitment practice and the standards for infringement decisions can, it is submitted, be justified by the consensual nature of commitment decisions and their underlying goal of procedural economy. Moreover, it is suggested that |
|
|
|
|