1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910705475603321

Autore

Haugerud Ralph Albert

Titolo

Preliminary interpretation of pre-2014 landslide deposits in the vicinity of Oso, Washington / / by Ralph A. Haugerud

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Reston, Virginia : , : U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, , 2014

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (4 pages) : color maps

Collana

Open-file report ; ; 2014-1065

Soggetti

Landslides - Washington (State) - Oso

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Title from title screen (viewed on July 28, 2014).

2.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910373943903321

Autore

Esfeld Michael

Titolo

Science and Human Freedom / / by Michael Esfeld

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Palgrave Macmillan, , 2020

ISBN

9783030377717

3030377717

Edizione

[1st ed. 2020.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (200 pages)

Disciplina

501

Soggetti

Science - Philosophy

Metaphysics

Philosophy of Science

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Nota di contenuto

1.Matter in Motion: the scientific image of the world -- 2. How Science



Explains: scientific explanations and their limits -- 3. Why the Mind Matters: the manifest image of the world. .

Sommario/riassunto

This book argues for two claims: firstly, determinism in science does not infringe upon human free will because it is descriptive, not prescriptive, and secondly, the very formulation, testing and justification of scientific theories presupposes human free will and thereby persons as ontologically primitive. The argument against predetermination is broadly Humean, or more precisely 'Super-Humean', whereas that against naturalist reduction is in large Kantian, drawing from Sellars on the scientific and the manifest image. Thus, whilst the book defends scientific realism against the confusion between fact and fake, it also reveals why scientific theories, laws and explanations cannot succeed in imposing norms for our actions upon us, neither on the level of the individual nor on that of society. Esfeld makes a strong case for an ontology of science that is minimally sufficient to explain our scientific and common sense knowledge, not only removing the concern that thelaws of nature are incompatible with human freedom, but furthermore showing how our freedom is in fact a very presupposition for science.