1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910370052803321

Autore

Rahm Laura

Titolo

Gender-Biased Sex Selection in South Korea, India and Vietnam [[electronic resource] ] : Assessing the Influence of Public Policy / / by Laura Rahm

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2020

ISBN

3-030-20234-8

Edizione

[1st ed. 2020.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (xxvi, 340 pages) : illustrations

Collana

Demographic Transformation and Socio-Economic Development, , 2543-0041 ; ; 11

Disciplina

613.94

Soggetti

Demography

Economic development

Social change

Population

Sociology

Asia—Politics and government

Development and Social Change

Population Economics

Gender Studies

Asian Politics

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Nota di contenuto

1. Gender-Biased Sex Selection in Asia: Motives, Methods, Magnitudes -- 2. History and Theory of Public Policies against Sex Selection -- 3. Methodology -- 4. South Korea -- 5. India -- 6. Vietnam -- 7. Cross-Country Comparison: Policies, Patterns and Processes -- 8. General Conclusion: Limited Evidence that Policies Normalize SRB.

Sommario/riassunto

This book provides an in-depth analysis of the influence of public policy on sex selection. Three Asian countries were chosen for the comparative policy analysis, namely South Korea, India and Vietnam that share in common a historical legacy of son preference, high levels of sex imbalances and active policy response to curbing the growing demographic masculinization of their nations. The research based on



the data collected from field work in the three countries shows that despite the adoption of very similar anti-sex selection policies the outcomes have been markedly different for each of the three countries. These unexpected diverse outcomes are explained partly by their different historical and cultural contexts, and partly to the different social, political and economic institutions and dynamics. This monograph offers careful and detailed explanations of both within and across country diversities in policy outcomes, pointing to the importance and the limits of cross-national policy learning and adoption, and raising questions about the efficacy of international organizations’ current approaches to global policy and knowledge transfer.