| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910349296403321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Handbook of paleoanthropology / / editors, Winfried Henke, Ian Tattersall |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Berlin, Heidelberg : , : Springer Berlin Heidelberg : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (XXV, 2069 p. 264 illus.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Paleoanthropology |
Human evolution |
Primates - Evolution |
Fossil hominids |
Human beings - Origin |
Paleoanthropology - Methodology |
Biological Evolution |
Hominidae |
Paleontology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Paleoanthropology is perhaps the most multidisciplinary of all the sciences. Any complete account of the evolution and cultural and biological context of Homo sapiens must combine information from geology, paleoecology, primatology, evolutionary biology and a host of other fields. Above all, historical information needs to be combined with, and interpreted in the light of, what we know of the living world. Paleoanthropology is also an actively developing field in which much remains to be settled. The three volumes of this handbook bring together contributions by the world´s leading specialists that reflect the broad spectrum of modern paleoanthropology, thus presenting an indispensable resource for both professionals and students alike. Volume 1 deals with principles, methods, and approaches. In recent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
years, enormous advances have been made in such areas as phylogenetic analysis, paleoecology and evolutionary theory and philosophy. The contributions in this first volume present the state of the art in these fields, provide succinct introductions to them and reflect the many ways in which they interact. As human beings are primates, Volume 2 is devoted to primate origins, evolution, behaviour, and adaptive variety. Its emphasis is on integration of fossil data with the vast amount that is now known of the behaviour and ecology of living primates in natural environments. Volume 3 deals with the fossil and molecular evidence for the evolution of Homo sapiens and its fossil relatives (the family Hominidae or subfamily Homininae, according to taste, a matter that we have left to the individual contributors). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910297046603321 |
|
|
Autore |
von Grafenstein Maximilian |
|
|
Titolo |
The Principle of Purpose Limitation in Data Protection Laws : : The Risk-based Approach, Principles, and Private Standards as Elements for Regulating Innovation / / Maximilian von Grafenstein |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2018 |
|
Baden-Baden : , : Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, , 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1 ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 electronic resource (676 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Schriften zur rechtswissenschaftlichen Innovationsforschung |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Data protection - Law and legislation - European Union countries |
Data protection - Law and legislation - Germany |
Data protection - Law and legislation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introduction -- Conceptual definitions as a link for regulation -- The function of the principle of purpose limitation in light of Article 8 ECFR and further fundamental rights -- Empirical approach in order to assist answering open legal questions -- Final conclusion: The principle of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
purpose limitation can not only be open towards but also enhancing innovation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Die Arbeit untersucht das datenschutzrechtliche Zweckbindungsprinzip aus der Perspektive der rechtswissenschaftlichen Innovationsforschung. Danach schützt das Zweckbindungsprinzip nicht nur die Autonomie der Betroffenen, sondern lässt zugleich den Verarbeitern ausreichend Spielraum, um im Rahmen ihrer Innovationsprozesse den Schutz optimal umzusetzen. In diesem Sinne stellt sich die Pflicht des Verarbeiters, die Zwecke der Verarbeitung zu spezifizieren, als ein Instrument des Vorsorgeschutzes dar. Es zielt darauf ab, spezifische Risiken, die sich aus der Datenverarbeitung für die Grundrechtsausübung des Betroffenen ergeben, frühzeitig zu erkennen. Demgegenüber zielt das Erfordernis, dass die spätere Verarbeitung nicht unvereinbar mit der ursprünglichen Zweckangabe sein darf, auf eine Kontrolle der zusätzlichen Risiken, die sich aus der späteren Verarbeitung ergeben. Dieser Interpretationsansatz zeigt eine Möglichkeit auf, wie nicht nur die Betroffenen effektiv vor den Risiken der Datenverarbeitung geschützt, sondern auch die Verarbeiter befähigt werden können, die Einhaltung der rechtlichen Vorschriften als innovationsfördernden Wettbewerbsvorteil zu nutzen. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |